Advertisement
Promo

Industry watch Toolkit

IT fails to staunch DWP fraud losses

Kable

Published: 26 Jul 2007 12:12 BST

  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendly
  • Post Comment

About £2.5bn was lost to fraud and error in benefit payments over the last year, according to the National Audit Office.

The figure is down from £2.7bn over the Department for Work and Pensions' (DWP) previous financial year, but was still deemed too high for the National Audit Office (NAO). Consequently, the watchdog refused to sign off the accounts — the 18th consecutive year in which this has happened.

Publishing the report, DWP Resource Accounts 2006-07, NAO head Sir John Bourn said on Wednesday: "Once again I have had to qualify my opinion on the DWP accounts because of the significant sums lost to fraud and error: £2.5bn or 2.1% in the last year."

VIDEO

Dialogue Box
Dialogue Box 7.4: The expanding digital universe

How much data will be created and stored in 50 years' time? Rupert and Charles make some extrapolations and come to a startling conclusion

View full video+

The report identifies limited IT integration as one reason for the high level of error, as well as complex benefits rules, poor business process design and human mistakes.

However, Bourn accepted that progress had been made in introducing new systems and procedures to reduce fraud and error and improve the recording of identified debts.

The report acknowledges a number of anti-fraud initiatives adopted by the DWP, including advanced data matching and comparing data from government and external sources.

It adds: "There are plans to further develop data matching using advanced IT systems, which will allow more timely identification of fraud and error and, in particular, help to target organised fraud rings."

In 2005, the DWP introduced its Debt Manager IT system to help cleanse data and put in place processes to support the valuation of overpayment debts recorded in its balance sheet. Commenting on this project, Bourn remarked: "Work by my staff has confirmed that this has been done well and provides a sound basis for the future."

  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendlyPrint with EPSON

Did you find this article useful?


Full Talkback thread

0 comments

Company/Topic Alerts

Create a new alert from the list below:





Discussions

CarlBrummy CarlBrummy

Ease the adoption pain...

Monday 16 November 2009, 4:50 PM

54 comments
NoThomas NoThomas

We can agree to disagree

Monday 16 November 2009, 3:55 PM

16 comments
CarlBrummy CarlBrummy

Enough already

Monday 16 November 2009, 9:36 AM

54 comments
Video icon

Video

Featured Talkback

In association with Network Liberation Movement
When all is said, if Microsoft produce the best product people will buy it and thats a good thing. If people have to buy their product because no one else can produce an alternative, only because interoperability protocols are kept secret, then thats a bad thing.

By: pround

Read full story:
EU court crushes Microsoft's antitrust appeal


Skip Sub Navigation Links to CNET Brand Links

Help

Become part of the ZDNet community.

Newsletters