ZDNet UK


Skip to Main Content

ZDNet.co.uk - Winner of Best Business Website 2007
  1. Home
  2. News
  3. Blogs
  4. Reviews
  5. Prices
  6. Resources
  7. Community
  8. My ZDNet

 

ZDNet UK RSS Feeds


IT Jobs

Industry watch Toolkit

Google's results are no cause for concern

Elinor Mills CNET News.com

Published: 20 Jul 2007 11:12 BST

  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendly
  • Post Comment

Google investors can be a nervous bunch.

The search giant disappointed Wall Street on Thursday, missing earnings expectations by three cents per share. After-hours traders reacted with alarm, sending the company's stock down more than seven percent by early evening to $509.53 (£248.19) per share. Other internet stocks, including Yahoo, eBay and Amazon.com, were pulled down in after-hours trading as well.

Now everyone needs to relax: Google isn't going out of business quite yet. Nor are eBay, Amazon.com or even Yahoo, for all its well-documented problems.

So what happened? Looks like the Googlers got a little ahead of themselves with spending. Specifically, it appears the culprits were payroll and data centre construction, Google chief executive Eric Schmidt said in a conference call with analysts. The company hired 1,548 employees during the quarter, bringing the total number of employees to 13,786.

"We overspent against our own plan in the area of head count," Schmidt said. "We will watch this closely going forward."

Translation: we made a mistake. And people shouldn't forget that this isn't the first time Google has blundered. The company missed earnings expectations for the fourth quarter 2005, citing a higher-than-expected tax rate. The stock fell more than nine percent in after-hours trade.

Wall Street 'flying blind'
The company bounced back from that hiccup. However, it's hard to call this most recent quarter a hiccup, unless you're buying into the overheated expectations on Wall Street.

Total revenue rose 58 percent from the same quarter a year ago to $3.87bn (£1.88bn) on continued strength in its core search advertising business. Excluding traffic acquisition costs, or commission paid to content partners, revenue was $2.72bn, $40m higher than what analysts were expecting.

Google's net income for the quarter was $925m, or $2.93 a share, up from $721m, or $2.33 a share, a year earlier. Excluding one-time items such as employee stock-based compensation, income was $1.12bn, or $3.56 a share, compared with $925m, or $2.93 a share, a year ago. But that was three cents less than what analysts were expecting, hence the after-hours hyperventilation.

"There seems to be an overreaction," said Derek Brown, of Cantor Fitzgerald, in a considerable underreaction.

You could blame Google, in part, for this response. Because its executives don't provide a forecast, minor stumbles like this can have a disproportionate impact. "The company doesn't offer guidance, so in general, [Wall] Street is flying to a large degree blind on a company that is projected to do $16bn-plus in revenue this year," Brown said.

But not all Wall Street analysts were disappointed. "Google did better than I expected and better than what any reasonable expectation should have been," Steve Weinstein of Pacific Crest Securities said. "The fundamentals are remarkable when you consider the overall industry and their share in that market."

Watch this

Dialogue Box
Dialogue Box 3.10: Memory lane

There are a number of runners and riders in the next-generation memory stakes; Dialogue Box has the inside track, plus highlights from series 3

View full video+

By contrast, Google's main rival Yahoo saw its second-quarter earnings drop from a year ago on slowing growth in its display advertising business. Yahoo, which had a management shakeup last month that led to co-founder Jerry Yang replacing Terry Semel as chief executive, also warned that revenue for the rest of the year would be lower than expected.

Google continues to expand its search market share. Google has a 52.7 percent share of the searches in the US, compared with Yahoo's 20.2 percent and Microsoft's 13.3 percent, according to Nielsen/NetRatings.

Not everything is perfect at the Googleplex, of course. The company has proposed a $3.1bn cash acquisition of online ad company DoubleClick, which would give it a needed boost in the display advertising market. The US Federal Trade Commission is investigating antitrust concerns with the deal, voiced by companies such as Microsoft and AT&T. And consumer groups say the acquisition poses privacy concerns because of the amount and types of consumer web data Google would have access to.

Google also faces copyright lawsuits over its book-scanning project and pirated videos that have appeared on its YouTube viral video site. "It would be great if those would go away," Schmidt said.

The company is experimenting with a system that will allow copyright holders to get their content removed from YouTube quickly, said co-founder Sergey Brin. "We're optimistic we will be able to deploy that widely in the next year," he said.

So Brown has same good advice for the nervous night-trading crowd: "Don't lose the forest for the trees."

  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendly Print with Kyocera

Did you find this article useful?


Full Talkback thread

0 comments

Company/Topic Alerts

Create a new alert from the list below:




Related Jobs

SAP MM/SRM Career-Hungry SAP Analysts - High Profile - London, Oxon

SAP MM/SRM career-hungry SAP Analysts required to work for a market leading FMCG in some of Europes top locations. Based in London or Oxfordshire, ...

Upstream Research Analysts, London & Edinburgh

Industry respected advisor to the energy industry seeks upstream research analysts to join the teams in wither London or Edinburgh. The upstream ...

URGENT - 2 x Business Analysts banking

I have an urgent need for two Business Analysts to join my key banking client based in Northampton. I am looking for people with Business and Data ...

Featured Talkback

When all is said, if Microsoft produce the best product people will buy it and thats a good thing. If people have to buy their product because no one else can produce an alternative, only because interoperability protocols are kept secret, then thats a bad thing.

By: pround

Read full story:
EU court crushes Microsoft's antitrust appeal