Advertisement
Promo

Compliance Toolkit

Google and SEC in tax dispute

Colin Barker ZDNet.co.uk

Published: 02 Mar 2007 14:34 GMT

  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendly
  • Post Comment

Google and the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) have been in dispute since March over "various issues" including the way in which Google accounts for income tax, the search giant revealed on Friday.

According to Google's annual report for 2006, filed with the SEC on Thursday, the issue remains unresolved (See paragraph 32, "Unresolved Staff Findings", in the Google document.)

The commission has expressed concerns about "various issues with respect to our public filings, including our provision for interim period effective", said Google in its filing. The dispute has been batted backwards and forwards seven times between Google and the SEC, the last time on 30 January this year.

In this last filing, Google admitted that the two sides have come to an impasse. "We have not resolved the comment," said Google in the filing. "We believe that we properly account for our income taxes. We will continue to work to resolve these comments with the SEC."

This is the first time Google has found itself at loggerheads with the American financial regulator, despite conjecture around the financial community about possible problems that may stem from the public activities of the company.

In March of last year, the SEC was alerted when Google's shares tumbled after the company's chief financial officer, George Reyes, admitted that "most of what's left is just organic growth, which means you have to grow your traffic and you have to grow your monetisation".

The SEC, which is always watching for possible evidence of share manipulation, generally takes an interest in a company when its shares move suddenly after a senior executive makes public comments.

There were also suggestions that Google might face investigation after its company founders gave an extensive interview to Playboy Magazine during the company's "quiet period", when executives are expected to refrain from public comments.

  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendlyPrint with EPSON

Did you find this article useful?
6 out of 10 people found this useful


Full Talkback thread

0 comments


Company/Topic Alerts

Create a new alert from the list below:






Video icon

Video

Cloud Watch Special Report

Five cloud computing myths exploded

Five cloud computing myths exploded

Analysis The cloud is providing a fertile habitat for the marketeers and their exaggerated claims. We examine the hokum and debunk the five most frequently peddled misconceptions about the cloud

More Special Reports

Sentry Posts Blog

Official Organizations Losing Data

How does this article from earlier today make you feel? How many more government, health service, or military officials are going to lose pen drives, DVDs, USB hard disks and even entire... More

2 comments

Twitter hack was DNS redirect

Twitter has said an attack on Thursday which took the site offline for many users was the result of a DNS redirect. A group calling itself the Iranian Cyber Army redirected users... More

1 comment

McKinnon lawyers seek judicial review

Lawyers seeking a judicial review for Nasa hacker Gary McKinnon lodged fresh evidence of his psychiatric state at the High Court on Thursday. Karen Todner, McKinnon's solicitor,... More

1 comment


Skip Sub Navigation Links to CNET Brand Links

Help

Become part of the ZDNet community.

Newsletters