Advertisement
Promo

Industry watch Toolkit

HP denies spying on former employee

Ina Fried CNET News

Published: 01 Mar 2007 15:17 GMT

  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendly
  • Post Comment

In a court filing on Tuesday, Hewlett-Packard denied allegations that it pretexted a former employee with whom it is engaged in a legal dispute.

In 2005, HP sued Karl Kamb, a former vice president of business development and strategy, alleging he stole company trade secrets. In January, Kamb countersued HP alleging that his phone records were improperly obtained and also charging that he was instructed by HP management to spy on rival Dell.

"HP denies that the so-called pretexting alleged by Kamb in the counterclaim occurred," the company said in a filing made Tuesday with a federal court in Tyler, Texas. "HP denies that any so-called pretexting activities were part of a widespread pattern or practice at HP."

While HP denies pretexting Kamb, the company has said that as part of a separate — and now infamous leak probe — it obtained or tried to obtain the phone records of more than a dozen people including current and former directors, employees and journalists, including three reporters from ZDNet UK sister site CNET News.com.

Last month the judge handling the case, District Court Judge Michael Schneider ordered Kamb to withdraw his countersuit and issued an injunction barring both sides from publicly discussing the case. Schneider said that Kamb could refile the case under seal.

Significant portions of HP's filing Tuesday were also made under seal.

Among the things the company did note publicly, is the fact that former ethics attorney Kevin Hunsaker was terminated by HP. The company confirmed in September that he had left the company's employ, but declined to say whether he resigned or was terminated.

Hunsaker has emerged as a central figure in both cases. In the leak probe, he faces felony charges over his role in allegedly overseeing the investigation, including the pretexting. In the current case, Kamb alleges that Hunsaker initially denied pretexting Kamb, but later admitted that HP did pretext him.

In its filing Tuesday, HP denied that Hunsaker "ever acknowledged that HP had engaged in so-called pretexting against Kamb".

  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendlyPrint with EPSON

Did you find this article useful?


Full Talkback thread

0 comments

Company/Topic Alerts

Create a new alert from the list below:






Discussions

58358 58358

Don't forget the tools

Monday 30 November 2009, 7:15 PM

4 comments
Video icon

Video

Featured Talkback

In association with Network Liberation Movement
When all is said, if Microsoft produce the best product people will buy it and thats a good thing. If people have to buy their product because no one else can produce an alternative, only because interoperability protocols are kept secret, then thats a bad thing.

By: pround

Read full story:
EU court crushes Microsoft's antitrust appeal


Skip Sub Navigation Links to CNET Brand Links

Help

Become part of the ZDNet community.

Newsletters