ZDNet UK


Skip to Main Content

ZDNet.co.uk - Winner of Best Business Website 2007
  1. Home
  2. News
  3. Blogs
  4. Reviews
  5. Prices
  6. Resources
  7. Community
  8. My ZDNet

 

ZDNet UK RSS Feeds


IT Jobs

Industry watch Toolkit

Steve Jobs takes another dollar from Apple

Ina Fried CNET News.com

Published: 14 Mar 2006 09:45 GMT

  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendly
  • Post Comment

Apple's chief executive, Steve Jobs, once again took home a $1 (60p) salary, although his net worth got a boost as the company's share price continued to soar.

Jobs has taken a $1 salary for the past few years, although in March 2003, he was awarded 10 million restricted shares of Apple stock that will be fully vested this month. With those holdings, Jobs owns about 1.2 percent of Apple's outstanding shares, according to the company's annual proxy statement, which was filed on Monday with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

As for other Apple executives' pay, chief operating officer Tim Cook was paid $602,434 in fiscal 2005, virtually unchanged from the prior year, although he also received a bonus of $600,239. Cook received no bonus in fiscal 2004, but he did receive $7.65m in restricted stock that year.

Ron Johnson, the Apple executive in charge of Apple's retail effort, received $552,795 in salary and $550,202 in bonus. For 2004, he received $484,836 in salary and $1.5m in bonus as well as $6.38m worth of restricted stock.

Jon Rubinstein, the iPod unit chief who is retiring this month, received $552,795 in salary and $551,239 in bonus for fiscal 2005, as compared with $485,216 in salary the prior year. He received no bonus in fiscal 2004, but did take home $6.38m worth of restricted stock.

Apple's board had suggested that the company issue more cash bonuses. In last year's proxy statement, Apple's board said that despite the prior year's restricted stock grants, executives at the company were underpaid and urged the company to begin a cash bonus programme.

An Apple shareholder, meanwhile, has put a proposal up for a vote urging the company to take a stronger stand on taking back products at the end of the products' lives. The measure, put forward by the Education Foundation of America, will be up for discussion and a vote at Apple's annual shareholder meeting, to be held on 27 April at Apple's headquarters in Cupertino, California

The shareholder proposal argues that "Dell and HP have both announced public computer take-back goals so stakeholders can measure progress against those goals... [while] Apple has not."

Apple, meanwhile, urges shareholders to vote against the proposal, noting that the company "has a strong environmental policy that goes well beyond the shareholder proposal's very narrow view of environmental stewardship."

Shareholders this year are also being asked to approve Apple's outside auditor, KPMG, as well as its slate of seven existing directors.

After being targeted by protestors, Jobs defended Apple's environmental record at last year's shareholder meeting.

  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendly Print with Dell

Did you find this article useful?
42 out of 102 people found this useful


Full Talkback thread

0 comments


Company/Topic Alerts

Create a new alert from the list below:










Related Jobs

*NEW* PHP Developer Bristol Circa 31,000

You will need a solid track record in PHP and MYSQL with any experience of design being a bonus but certainly not essential. Looking for a PHP ...

Senior Java Developer-Birmingham-33-38k

This is a permanent role offering a very attractive salary including an attractive bonus! I have an urgent requirement for a Senior Java Developer to ...

Business Analyst Cash Equities Trading Operations London City

You will have aa proven track record of delivery ideally gained in a Operational Cash Equities coupled with Securitised Products and Stock Borrow & ...

Discussions

keithmv keithmv

Password Deadlock

Saturday 26 July 2008, 12:02 PM

2 comments

Featured Talkback

When all is said, if Microsoft produce the best product people will buy it and thats a good thing. If people have to buy their product because no one else can produce an alternative, only because interoperability protocols are kept secret, then thats a bad thing.

By: pround

Read full story:
EU court crushes Microsoft's antitrust appeal