ZDNet UK


Skip to Main Content

ZDNet.co.uk - Winner of Best Business Website 2007
  1. Home
  2. News
  3. Blogs
  4. Reviews
  5. Prices
  6. Resources
  7. Community
  8. My ZDNet

 

ZDNet UK RSS Feeds


IT Jobs

Databases Toolkit

Microsoft staff defend blog censorship

Andrew Donoghue ZDNet.co.uk

Published: 05 Jan 2006 17:45 GMT

  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendly
  • Post Comment

A senior Microsoft manager has defended the decision to remove the blog of a Chinese journalist from the company's MSN Spaces site, claiming that content which breaks national laws must be taken down.

Michael Connolly, a product unit manager on MSN Spaces, posted an entry on his personal blog site on Thursday claiming that Microsoft faces a lot of "complicated issues" in China, but insisted that the organisation has not become more aggressive in the way it moderates its user's content.

"In China, there is a unique issue for our entire industry: there are certain aspects of speech in China that are regulated by the government. We've made a choice to run a service in China, and to do that, we need to adhere to local regulations and laws. This is not unique to MSN Spaces; this is something that every company has to do if they operate in China," Connolly said.

The blog in question, written by Zhao Jing, also known as Michael Anti, was removed from MSN servers on New Year's Eve, according to a posting earlier this week by investigative journalist and former CNN reporter Rebecca Mackinnon.

Responding to Microsoft's official comment on the issue and the unofficial comments from Microsoft employee blogs, Mackinnon claimed that the issue goes beyond China.

"The behaviour of companies like Microsoft, Yahoo and others — and their eager willingness to comply with Chinese government demands — shows a fundamental lack of respect for users and our fundamental human rights," she said. "Microsoft, Yahoo and others are helping to institutionalise and legitimise the integration of censorship into the global IT business model."

Another Microsoft blogger, Alfred Thompson, who works in the company's academic relations department, posted an entry on his personal site on Thursday asking for more information on the reasons behind the decision to remove Anti's blog.

"Openness and more information is the best answer when there is a lack of good information. Someone (other than me) has to make some tough decision around all this. They have more information and more to think about than I do," Thompson stated.

But Thompson questioned the logic of Microsoft pulling out of China purely over the free-speech issue claiming the only way to facilitate change is from within.

"There are times when I think we should all stop doing business with China until they become a democracy. And then I think about how well that has worked with Cuba," he said. "Occasionally a blogger is forced to move hosting services and that is wrong and it is a shame on us all. But is it enough to paint a company as an evil servant of tyranny and a threat to human rights? Give me a break."

Both Thompson and Connolly said that the opinions contained in their blogs are their own and do not reflect the official views of Microsoft. On Wednesday, the company said that "local laws and practices require consideration of unique elements".

  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendly Print with HP

Did you find this article useful?
105 out of 219 people found this useful


Full Talkback thread

0 comments

Company/Topic Alerts

Create a new alert from the list below:





Related Jobs

FINANCIAL SOFTWARE DEVELOPER 2008 ENTRY LEVEL

20098 FINANCIAL SOFTWARE DEVELOPER 2008 ENTRY LEVEL The Company Bloomberg is the leading global provider of financial market information. This in ...

Data Entry - Bristol

Huxley Associates client is looking for a Data Entry Assistant. You will need experience with Microsoft Office applications and ideally have come ...

Project Manager (IVR / Speech Recognition)

The successful candidate will ensure the successful delivery of complex IVR and Speech self-service applications. To apply for this position you will ...

Featured Talkback

How can it be true that doing the work of gathering and concentrating information about a person and placing it in a single database with multiple access routes; makes that information more secure?! I would suggest that most people would make the implicit assumption that that would make it *less* secure.

By: Andrew Meredith

Read full story:
Police chief criticises ID cards scheme