Advertisement
Promo

Security threats Toolkit

Still an open range for junk faxes in California

Greg Sandoval CNET News

Published: 23 Dec 2005 09:35 GMT

  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendly
  • Post Comment

California fax machine owners tired of watching junk faxes eat up their toner cartridges and paper will have to wait a little longer for relief.

A law designed to ban marketers from sending unsolicited faxes was set to take effect in California on 1 January, 2006, but SB 833 is being held up in court after the US Chamber of Commerce issued a legal challenge.

In a joint effort with fax company Xpedite Systems, the Chamber of Commerce filed a lawsuit in Sacramento federal court and on Wednesday won an injunction that will stay the law at least until 31 January, 2006. A hearing is scheduled for 23 January.

At issue is California's decision to write a tougher law than the Junk Fax Prevention Act passed by the US Congress last summer. The federal law allows companies to send faxes to people or businesses they have had prior business dealings with, but the California law doesn't.

Even "if you've been doing business with someone for years, then you have to take on some significant costs to comply with (the California) law," said Amar Sarwal, general litigation counsel for the US Chamber of Commerce, a nonprofit business advocacy group. "We think this will make it hard on small- and middle-size business and maybe some larger ones."

Ironically, the US Chamber of Commerce was among the biggest backers of the federal anti-junk-fax law. In recent years, the US government has tried to respond to the nation's fax machine owners, who have blamed higher paper and ink costs on the blizzard of junk faxes they receive.

State Senator Debra Bowen, a Democrat, says the federal law doesn't go far enough to protect fax machine owners. Allowing marketers an exemption just because they say they had a prior relationship with someone is no good unless they can prove it, she asserts.

"In the federal law, there is no requirement for anyone to demonstrate that a prior business relationship existed," Bowen said. "Anyone could say, 'I had a business dealing with someone way back when,' and we'd have to take them at their word."

Both California and federal laws allow recipients of illegal faxes to sue the sender. If a court finds that a sender willfully or knowingly violated the law, it can award a recipient up to $1,500 (£862) per violation.

Bowen said she's confident that California is on sound legal footing and that Americans from across the country would support such a law.

"I've received zero calls from anyone demanding their constitutional right to receive more junk faxes," she said.

  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendlyPrint with EPSON

Did you find this article useful?
37 out of 109 people found this useful


Full Talkback thread

1 comment

  1. No loophole. 47USC227 clearly bans junk fax and s... Olavi Petri

Company/Topic Alerts

Create a new alert from the list below:



Video icon

Video

Sentry Posts Blog

Official Organizations Losing Data

How does this article from earlier today make you feel? How many more government, health service, or military officials are going to lose pen drives, DVDs, USB hard disks and even entire... More

2 comments

Twitter hack was DNS redirect

Twitter has said an attack on Thursday which took the site offline for many users was the result of a DNS redirect. A group calling itself the Iranian Cyber Army redirected users... More

1 comment

McKinnon lawyers seek judicial review

Lawyers seeking a judicial review for Nasa hacker Gary McKinnon lodged fresh evidence of his psychiatric state at the High Court on Thursday. Karen Todner, McKinnon's solicitor,... More

1 comment

Win a BlackBerry with Vlingo voice recognition

Win a BlackBerry with Vlingo voice recognition

What is ZDNet UK's usual tagline?

Competition closes - 14 Jan 2010


Skip Sub Navigation Links to CNET Brand Links

Help

Become part of the ZDNet community.

Newsletters