Advertisement
Promo

Compliance Toolkit

CBI calls for cybercrime laws to be updated

Graeme Wearden ZDNet.co.uk

Published: 22 Nov 2005 14:00 GMT

  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendly
  • Post Comment

The Confederation of British Industry (CBI) has added its voice to the growing clamour calling for the UK's Computer Misuse Act to be updated.

Jeremy Beale, head of e-business policy at the CBI, told the Broadband Britain Summit 2005 in London on Monday the government is taking a dangerous gamble by attempting to get more people to use the Internet without also taking steps to increase online safety.

"The government is walking towards a political time bomb by trying to get all these excluded groups like the elderly and the unemployed online while just relying on awareness campaigns," said Beale.

"Awareness campaigns are important. But the Government could — as it has been encouraged to — amend the Computer Misuse Act," Beale added.

The Computer Misuse Act was passed in 1990 — years before hacking became the widespread threat it is today, and before Tim Berners-Lee created the Web. In recent years, many experts have warned that the CMA is inadequate, because it does not cover modern threats such as denial-of-service attacks. Also, its penalties are too lenient to allow UK citizens to be extradited abroad in line with the UK's obligations under the Cybercrime Convention, or for foreign suspects to be brought here for trial.

Last month, a UK teenager was cleared of wrongdoing under the CMA after allegedly unleashing a DoS attack on his former employer, because such activity is not covered by the CMA – sparking calls for the law to be revised.

A Home Office spokesperson said at the time that the government was "aware of the issue", but Beale wasn't impressed. "The Home Office has been sitting on it for years," Beale claimed. "The Home Office may say it's waiting for agreement with Europe, but you can wait for Europe forever".

However, Beale cautioned that the government could not bring in laws to compel people to use security protection: "That's a false dichotomy. You can't regulate people to protect themselves."

  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendly
  • Post Comment

Did you find this article useful?
83 out of 139 people found this useful


Full Talkback thread

1 comment

  1. Interesting article Bob

Company/Topic Alerts

Create a new alert from the list below:






Video icon

Video

Cloud Watch Special Report

Five cloud computing myths exploded

Five cloud computing myths exploded

Analysis The cloud is providing a fertile habitat for the marketeers and their exaggerated claims. We examine the hokum and debunk the five most frequently peddled misconceptions about the cloud

More Special Reports

Sentry Posts Blog

Met will not reopen phone hack investi...

The Metropolitan Police will not reopen its investigation into alleged phone hacking by the News of the World. In a press statement delivered outside Scotland Yard on Thursday, Assistant... More

Post a comment

FUD over ChromeOS's security already?

It hasn't taken long for the security vendors to wake to the potential of Google's new ChromeOS. The potential that is, to create FUD – fear uncertainty and doubt. In a release today,... More

Post a comment

Feds take DDoS in their stride

The US Department of Homeland Security has said that a series of distributed denial-of-service attacks began on US government networks on 4 July. However, Amy Kudwa, deputy press... More

Post a comment


Skip Sub Navigation Links to CNET Brand Links

Help

Become part of the ZDNet community.

Newsletters