Microsoft moves goalposts in Google battle
Published: 10 Aug 2005 09:25 BST
In a likely effort to remove local bias in favour of Google, Microsoft is attempting to shift Google's countersuit in the Kai-Fu Lee case from a California court to federal court.
A 29 July court filing by Microsoft technically means the case has moved to federal court, but Google can still ask a federal judge to let the case surrounding the ex-Microsoft executive proceed in state court, according to a legal expert.
Late last month, Microsoft filed to switch to federal court Google's request that a California judge invalidate Microsoft's non-compete agreement with Lee, who was hired by Google to head its operations in China. In its filing with the US District Court for the Northern District of California, Microsoft argued that the dispute qualifies as a federal case in part because the two companies are based in different states.
Microsoft may be seeking to reduce the possibility that pro-Google sentiment in Santa Clara County would influence the state court, said another attorney who's followed the case. Federal judges are not elected, and potential jurors for the federal court located in San Jose, California, would hail from a wider geography, he said. Google is based in Mountain View, California, a city in Santa Clara County.
Neither Microsoft nor Google immediately responded to requests for comment. (Google representatives have instituted a policy of not talking with ZDNet UK sister site CNET News.com reporters until July 2006 in response to privacy issues raised by a previous story.)
The change in court venue adds another twist to a bitter and legally complex dispute between two of the tech world's biggest players.
After Google announced Lee would lead its Chinese operations last month, Microsoft sued both of them in a Washington state court. Microsoft claimed Lee was violating a non-compete clause of his employment agreement in accepting his new job.
A Washington judge has ruled that until at least September, Lee cannot perform work at Google that competes with what he did at Microsoft — including planning for the Chinese search market.
With its California request, Google appeared to be trying to take advantage of a state rule that frowns on non-compete contract clauses.
Did you find this article useful?
51 out of 123 people found this useful
- Share this article:
