ZDNet UK


Skip to Main Content

ZDNet.co.uk - Winner of Best Business Website 2007
  1. Home
  2. News
  3. Blogs
  4. Reviews
  5. Prices
  6. Resources
  7. Community
  8. My ZDNet

 

ZDNet UK RSS Feeds


IT Jobs

Industry watch Toolkit

RIM creates patent 'workaround'

Michael Singer CNET News.com

Published: 17 Jun 2005 10:30 BST

  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendly
  • Post Comment

Research In Motion has come up with a 'workaround' to skirt patents at the centre of its legal battle with NTP, and the technology could be used with all existing BlackBerry email devices, the firm's co-chief executive said on Thursday.

"We've completed the workaround," RIM chairman and co-CEO Jim Balsillie said. "We've tested it and we have a legal opinion on it. We have it as an option."

In a phone interview, Balsillie declined to give specifics on the technology, citing both companies' nondisclosure agreements and RIM's so-called quiet period prior to announcing its earnings.

Balsillie said he is prepared to win the long-running legal battle and was encouraged that the director of the U.S. Patent Trademark office asked that four of the five patents in dispute be reexamined -- a process that could take years.

RIM, which helped popularise mobile emailing with its thumb-operated BlackBerry, rattled investors earlier this month with news it failed to finalise a $450m (£247m) patent dispute settlement with US-based patent holding company NTP.

The patent deal would have resolved the bitter and potentially damaging dispute. The impasse revives the risk of a court injunction that would halt US sales of RIM's flagship wireless email device.

"I'm not trying to change the deal, we are trying to finalise it," Balsillie said. "There are so many shades of grey in this case, but we expect the courts to uphold the agreement."

NTP successfully sued RIM in 2002 for patent infringement, winning an injunction in 2003 to halt U.S. BlackBerry sales that was stayed pending appeals.

In December, a US appeals court upheld the patent infringement finding against RIM, but said part of the earlier ruling was flawed and sent the case back to a lower court.

The Canadian company agreed in March to pay $450 million, believed to be one of the largest such settlements, and it predicted the negotiation of a final settlement within weeks.

RIM has now asked a US court to enforce the terms of the March deal. NTP opposes that and says the earlier deal did not constitute a meeting of minds.

In a court filing this week, RIM said the continued litigation "places a cloud of uncertainty" over its business and its ability to supply its technology.

"There's been an effort certainly by people to sort of cast uncertainty (on) our business and we don't want that. And that was part of the motivation for doing the original settlement," Balsillie said.

"We're not trying to change the settlement. We're not trying to pay less. We're not trying to modify the scope. And we really want to put this thing behind us."

Balsillie declined to speculate on when the RIM will hear back from the U.S. courts on the issue. He also said RIM was keeping its eye out for smaller acquisitions that would augment its technology.

"We're not contemplating at this time a big monster acquisition, something that is dramatically outside of our current strategy," he said.

Shares of RIM closed up 2.5 percent, or $1.77, at $73.78 on Nasdaq on a volume of more than 8.4 million. In Toronto, the stock rose C$1.89 to C$91.14.

  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendly Print with Kyocera

Did you find this article useful?
63 out of 105 people found this useful


Full Talkback thread

0 comments

Company/Topic Alerts

Create a new alert from the list below:





Discussions

0xyGen 0xyGen

Please help me in choosing web hosting

Sunday 20 July 2008, 10:32 AM

1 post
1000030281 1000030281

Facebook Bans Firefox 3

Sunday 20 July 2008, 2:33 AM

1 comment

Featured Talkback

When all is said, if Microsoft produce the best product people will buy it and thats a good thing. If people have to buy their product because no one else can produce an alternative, only because interoperability protocols are kept secret, then thats a bad thing.

By: pround

Read full story:
EU court crushes Microsoft's antitrust appeal