Advertisement
Promo

Industry watch Toolkit

Generic cartridges leave mark on Lexmark profits

Ingrid Marson ZDNet.co.uk

Published: 27 Apr 2005 13:25 BST

  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendly
  • Post Comment

US printer manufacturer Lexmark said on Tuesday that third-party printer cartridges are impacting its sales figures.

Customers are increasingly buying lower-priced 'generic' ink cartridges, which has reduced Lexmark's profits and revenue growth, according to the Financial Times. Lexmark reported a first-quarter operating profit of $161.7m (£84.94m) from revenues of $1.358 billion. This represents a first-quarter revenue increase of eight percent from 2004 to 2005, compared with an increase of 13 percent from 2003 to 2004.

The issue of third-party vendors selling printer cartridges is one that affects all printer manufacturers. Last month, printer manufacturer HP sued two companies that sell refilled ink cartridges.

It alleged that one of the companies, InkCycle, violated three HP patents with its ink. It accused the other company, RhinoTek, of false advertising by using packaging that indicated did not indicate that its refilled HP printer cartridges were recycled.

Last year Lexmark lost a legal battle over cartridge refills. The company alleged in 2003 that Static Control Components had violated the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA) by selling its Smartek chips to companies that refill toner cartridges and undercut Lexmark's prices. But, in October 2004, a US federal court ruled that Static Control can continue selling the chip, as the DMCA allows exemptions for the purpose of interoperability.

  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendly
  • Post Comment

Did you find this article useful?
66 out of 116 people found this useful


Full Talkback thread

0 comments

Company/Topic Alerts

Create a new alert from the list below:




Discussions

hkommedal hkommedal

About collecting data etc.

Thursday 9 July 2009, 10:18 PM

9 comments
Moley Moley

Re: Privacy Issues

Thursday 9 July 2009, 8:15 PM

9 comments
Video icon

Video

Featured Talkback

When all is said, if Microsoft produce the best product people will buy it and thats a good thing. If people have to buy their product because no one else can produce an alternative, only because interoperability protocols are kept secret, then thats a bad thing.

By: pround

Read full story:
EU court crushes Microsoft's antitrust appeal


Skip Sub Navigation Links to CNET Brand Links

Help

Become part of the ZDNet community.

Newsletters