Management Toolkit

Why are women in IT an endangered species?

Ed Frauenheim and Alorie Gilbert CNET News.com

Published: 07 Feb 2005 17:35 GMT

Why are women in IT an endangered species? The numbers of women in IT has never been high, but the numbers in the industry and doing related courses are dropping off rapidly. There are efforts afoot to remedy this, but are they working?

The computer science world was anything but welcoming to Maribel Gonzalez.

After a harrowing first year, she quit the computer science program at the University of California at Los Angeles. Until that point -- six years ago -- Gonzalez had excelled at mathematics and had looked forward to a computer-centric career. But at UCLA, she felt overwhelmed by the programming experience of her mostly male peers. With no programming classes under her belt, the "sink or swim"-style courses, she said, did not suit her.

"I never worked so hard to get Cs," recalls Gonzalez, now a public-school teacher in New York. "It was a blow to my ego, and it scared me."

Gonzalez' tale is at the centre of a trend that is disheartening to many.

Data from the American National Science Foundation shows that the female share of bachelor's degrees in computer science from American colleges dropped from 37 percent in 1985 to 28 percent in 2001. And while women comprised 33 percent of information technology professionals in America in 1990, that figure was down to 26 percent in 2002, according to NSF. The drop is puzzling in part because women are making progress in related areas such as the natural sciences.

On the other hand, some efforts to bring women back to computing appear to be paying off. That's seen as vital for reasons including fuelling the world's tech economy and preventing male bias in the way future technology is developed. "Any sort of monoculture is bad," said Radia Perlman, a researcher at Sun Laboratories. "You need people that can think from a different angle."

Harvard president ignites controversy
Spurred by the furore over recent remarks by Harvard University President Lawrence Summers, the topic of the declining participation of women in IT is now prominent among concerns about the future of high technology in the United States.

At a conference late last month, Summers suggested that innate differences between the genders could help explain why fewer women succeed in science and math careers.

Although he eventually offered a public apology, Summers touched a nerve and sparked a protest letter.

A growing body of research suggests that there are real differences between the brains of men and women.

But a number of scholars reject the idea that women are biologically less apt to succeed in the computer science field. They point instead to factors such as the stereotype of computer jockeying as a geeky, male profession. The long hours often required with computing jobs also may deter women who wish to raise children.

Cornelia Brunner, associate director of the Centre for Children & Technology, argues that a societal swing toward conservative values over the past few decades has helped frame technology in masculine terms -- as a powerful "magic wand," she said, rather than a tool that could help or hurt society.

"In a very, very deep way, it turns women off," Brunner said. "It puts the machine at the centre, rather than its capabilities."