Advertisement
Promo

Compliance Toolkit

NHS to allow opt-outs from database

Kablenet.com

Published: 18 Jan 2005 16:50 GMT

  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendly
  • Post Comment

The NHS National Programme for IT has said that patients can opt out of having their records kept on databases only in 'extreme circumstances'

NPfIT outlined the position in response to media reports covering health minister John Hutton's comments on plans for storing records. He was reported by the BBC as saying that patients could "opt out" of having their records electronically stored, with no mention of conditions attached to the right.

This runs counter to NPfIT's previously stated position that, while patients could prevent their data being shared around the health service, they could not prevent it being held in databases. This is a core feature of its plans for a National Care Record Service of patient data.

A NPfIT spokesperson told Government Computing News on Monday: "In extreme circumstances, if someone can show that having their information held electronically on NHS databases will cause them or someone else unwarranted substantial damage or distress, then they can opt out of having their data held on NHS databases."

"This will apply to very few people. It creates significant difficulties treating people because clinicians have professional obligations to keep proper notes and in the future notes will be kept electronically. The full implications will have to be explained to patients."

The spokesperson also reiterated that patients could opt out of having their data shared. This will not require that they show it will do harm, but the NHS will take steps to ensure they understand the possible implications for their healthcare.

If they opt out, their data will still be sent to the national database. They will still have local electronic records and a national shared record, but it will be "locked down" so that no one [except possibly in the future the patient] can see it.

"Local records will also have more access controls so that data will only be accessible to those who generate it and their organisations, but will not be accessible to clinicians in other local NHS organisations," the spokesperson said. "For these patients, discharge and referral will be done in traditional ways, with a communication between clinicians rather than giving permission to access the patient's record.

"Patients will not get the full benefits of having shared records but clinicians will still be able to keep proper records (that remain within their organisations). Should patients change their minds, their 'national shared records' can be activated for sharing immediately and additional access controls around local records can be removed."

The spokesperson also said patients would be able to use the 'patient sealed envelope'. This would enable them to designate certain information to be hidden from normal view when data is shared.

"They can decide themselves, on a case by case basis, who they wish to see information they have hidden or sealed in this way. This allows them to have the benefits of data sharing while giving them more control over particularly sensitive data," the spokesperson said.

There may be rare circumstances in which the NHS may refuse a request to seal information, notably when it may clash with the need to protect the health or safety of NHS staff or someone else.

  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendly
  • Post Comment

Did you find this article useful?
55 out of 104 people found this useful



Company/Topic Alerts

Create a new alert from the list below:



Video icon

Video

Cloud Watch Special Report

Five cloud computing myths exploded

Five cloud computing myths exploded

Analysis The cloud is providing a fertile habitat for the marketeers and their exaggerated claims. We examine the hokum and debunk the five most frequently peddled misconceptions about the cloud

More Special Reports

Sentry Posts Blog

Met will not reopen phone hack investi...

The Metropolitan Police will not reopen its investigation into alleged phone hacking by the News of the World. In a press statement delivered outside Scotland Yard on Thursday, Assistant... More

Post a comment

FUD over ChromeOS's security already?

It hasn't taken long for the security vendors to wake to the potential of Google's new ChromeOS. The potential that is, to create FUD – fear uncertainty and doubt. In a release today,... More

Post a comment

Feds take DDoS in their stride

The US Department of Homeland Security has said that a series of distributed denial-of-service attacks began on US government networks on 4 July. However, Amy Kudwa, deputy press... More

Post a comment


Skip Sub Navigation Links to CNET Brand Links

Help

Become part of the ZDNet community.

Newsletters