ZDNet UK


Skip to Main Content

ZDNet.co.uk - Winner of Best Business Website 2007
  1. Home
  2. News
  3. Blogs
  4. Reviews
  5. Jobs
  6. Resources
  7. Community
  8. My ZDNet

 

ZDNet UK RSS Feeds


Compliance Toolkit

Tegam defends copyright action against researcher

Munir Kotadia ZDNet Australia

Published: 12 Jan 2005 13:50 GMT

  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendly
  • Post Comment

Tegam International, the French software developer that is suing a security researcher after he exploited vulnerabilities in the company's Viguard antivirus software, has defended its actions.

In 2001, Guillaume Tena claimed to have found a number of vulnerabilities in the Tegam's Viguard antivirus software. The company responded by initiating legal action against Tena and the resulting trial means the researcher could face four months in jail and have to pay a €6,000 fine. Additionally, Tegam is proceeding with a civil case against Tena and asking for €900,000 in damages.

Tegam's behaviour has been heavily criticised by readers of ZDNet worldwide, and numerous other sites, for allegedly ignoring security vulnerabilities in its software instead of fixing them. However, Tegam is adamant that Tena's claims are false and his motives are questionable.

Eyal Dotan, head of research and design at Tegam, told ZDNet UK sister site ZDNet Australia that the trial is "more complex than it seems" because it is not just about someone exposing vulnerabilities in its products.

He accused Tena of sending an email to the head of human resources at Tegam saying that their product was worthless and that he was going to prove it.

He added that Tena's research was flawed.

"He did very simplistic 'vulnerability' research – by modifying Viguard's executable and data files on Windows 98 and showing that the program doesn't work well anymore," said Dotan.

In March last year, before the trial, Tegam published an article on its Web site discrediting Tena's findings.

According to Tegam's Web site, Tena's research claimed that Viguard uses a heuristic detection method or a signature database to function. The company said both these statements were inaccurate.

"Viguard's main advantage is that it does not need virus signatures to stop infections. Despite this response explaining the facts, the assault against the company continued".

The trial is being held in a Paris court and is expected to conclude on 8 March, 2005.

Munir Kotadia reported from Sydney for ZDNet Australia. For more ZDNet Australia stories, click here.

  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendlyPrint with Konica

Did you find this article useful?
54 out of 138 people found this useful


Full Talkback thread

0 comments

Company/Topic Alerts

Create a new alert from the list below:













Loading Video Player ....

Featured Talkback

In association with Intel
There will be further activation issues to watch out for as Microsoft plans to offer a similar service to independent software vendors whereby they can "control" licensing through activation and other measures similar to the Software Protection Platform.

By: DefenceIT

Read full story:
Microsoft outage down to 'human error'

Sentry Posts Blog

Nasa hacker loses last-ditch appeal

Self-confessed Nasa hacker Gary McKinnon has lost his appeal to Home Secretary Jacqui Smith against extradition to the US. In an email sent to ZDNet.co.uk on Monday, McKinnon's... More

1 comment

Up to 1.7m MoD personal details missin...

The potential number of people affected by the the loss of a hard disk containing MoD details could be a high as 1.7 million, defence minister Bob Ainsworth told parliament on Monday. In... More

Post a comment

Toshiba touts Quantum Key Distribution

Toshiba research scientists have developed a method of distributing quantum keys more efficiently, the company has claimed in a statement: "[Quantum Key Distribution -- ] QKD --... More

Post a comment