ZDNet UK


Skip to Main Content

ZDNet.co.uk - Winner of Best Business Website 2007
  1. Home
  2. News
  3. Blogs
  4. Reviews
  5. Prices
  6. Resources
  7. Community
  8. My ZDNet

 

ZDNet UK RSS Feeds


IT Jobs

Online business Toolkit

Kazaa owner denied office-raid appeal

Abby Dinham ZDNet Australia

Published: 08 Oct 2004 12:20 BST

  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendly
  • Post Comment

Sharman Networks and Brilliant Digital Entertainment (BDE) have been denied application for leave to appeal the Anton Piller orders that facilitated raids on the companies' premises.

Sharman and BDE -- along with affiliated companies -- were raided in February this year on suspicion of music copyright infringement relating to their management and distribution of the Kazaa software.

The Sharman parties argue that "substantial injustice" was caused by the Anton Piller orders, claiming that some material seized was irrelevant to the case and that an appeal is necessary to remove "the slur on the reputation" of the company.

In addition, BDE claimed the raids were a "very considerable invasion of privacy" which has caused them a "real economic loss" from the publicity surrounding the case.

However the full Court of Appeal ruled in favour of Universal Music Australia (and affiliated parties), with judges Black and Stone stating in their reasons for denial that "in our view these matters would not, either individually or cumulatively, occasion injustice to the applicants of such a character and to such a degree as to justify the grant of leave".

The judges added that the seized material is in the custody of a third party and as such was not "insecure or vulnerable in any way" and "while the present situation is undoubtedly inconvenient for the applicants for leave [Sharman and BDE], we do not see this as amounting to substantial injustice."

The chief executive officer of Sharman Networks, Nikki Hemming, said the company was disappointed with the decision. However, she added that it had "no bearing" on the copyright infringement case itself.

"We feel the granting of the Anton Piller order was legally wrong and that was our basis for bringing the matter before the court. We are now focused on winning the current case," said Hemming.

The next hearing is scheduled for 14 October to address any further motions concerning discovery, and to decide if any parties should be struck out from the case.

ZDNet Australia's Abby Dinham reported from Sydney. For more coverage from ZDNet Australia, click here.

  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendly Print with Dell

Did you find this article useful?
68 out of 121 people found this useful


Full Talkback thread

0 comments

Company/Topic Alerts

Create a new alert from the list below:





Related Jobs

Enterprise Applications Finance Hyperion Consultant - Senior Manager - London

Consumer business In addition, applicants should also be able to demonstrate strong written and verbal communication skills as this role involves ...

SAP Portal Support Team Lead

Key Responsibilities: - Ensure that calls are prioritised and solved according to SLA targets - Update documentation repository and call handling ...

Web Applications Developer

Applicants are requested to provide URLs or samples of your work, where possible, clearly stating your role in the project. Kings College London ...

Sentry Posts Blog

Mobile Security Expert: Your Camera Ph...

Mobile Security Expert: Your Camera Phone Got Hacked Author: Eric Everson, Founder MyMobiSafe.com Have you ever heard someone say “I’d like to be a fly on the wall in that room.”?... More

Post a comment

Skype - The Roach Motel

Here is an interesting article from The National Business Review, pointing out once again that you can never delete a Skype account. Never. Period. This is something I am familiar... More

Post a comment

The vPhone: Why Visa Should Go Mobile

The vPhone: Why Visa Should Go Mobile Author: Eric Everson, Founder MyMobiSafe.com With all of the success of Apple’s iPhone, there is a growing case to support a company like Visa... More

Post a comment

Featured Talkback

I wonder, who needs .asia domain? I cannot imagine, what would be useful for Microsoft.asia? Toyota.asia? Then let's register .europe (if .eu is too short). Or perhaps Microsoft.southamerica, Dell.australiaandnewzealand, Coca-Cola.africa... Sound funny? Then why not just use the global and country domains? Or perhaps it is time to drop the domains at all?

By: LadyRoot

Read full story:
Businesses advised to register .asia domains