ZDNet UK


Skip to Main Content

ZDNet.co.uk - Winner of Best Business Website 2007
  1. Home
  2. News
  3. Blogs
  4. Reviews
  5. Jobs
  6. Resources
  7. Community
  8. My ZDNet

 

ZDNet UK RSS Feeds


Compliance Toolkit

Sharman's mystery owner 'must be revealed'

Abby Dinham ZDNet Australia

Published: 27 Jul 2004 09:20 BST

  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendly
  • Post Comment

Sharman Networks' lawyers have been asked to reveal the identity of the company's owner for the first time, as the parent company of the file-sharing software Kazaa faced copyright infringement allegations in the Federal Court in Sydney today. Universal Music parties' lawyers called upon Sharman Networks to reveal the anonymous figure controlling the corporation in its request for evidential discovery. Justice Murray Wilcox agreed, saying this "was not an unusual request".

"Miss Hemming [chief executive officer and the public face of Sharman thus far] seems to be a key player… on whose behalf is she playing," said Wilcox. "Who is controlling these activities?"

The discovery notice issued to Sharman Networks' counsel kicked off the official process of discovery in the case, which has been hotly debated since the premises of Sharman Networks, its affiliates and other individuals and companies were raided and evidence confiscated last February.

The request submitted to Sharman from Universal's lawyers called for the respondents to give details of the "ownership and control structure of the corporate respondents, the financial and managerial aspects of the various relationships and the historical background to these arrangements".

"Discovery of the documents in these categories is particularly important given that the first and second respondents appear to have been incorporated pursuant to the International Company of Vanuatu," stated the request. The first respondent to the case is Sharman Licence Holdings and the second Sharman Networks.

However, the counsel for Sharman, Bob Ellicott QC, objected to the request, saying it was irrelevant to the case.

However, Wilcox retorted that "it's not as though this is not controversial [referring to the case]… it is not an unreasonable thing for the applicants to know who it is that's controlling the system".

A company called Worldwide Nominees was named as the sole director of Sharman Networks (of Port Vila) last week during correspondence between the two parties over the process of discovery.

The shareholders of the company remain publicly anonymous -- however the director has been named as a Geoffrey R. Gee.

The points of discovery were debated by both parties on Monday. Each of the parties were ordered to redraft their applications as the process of discovery continues. A hearing of the case is tentatively scheduled for 29 November.

For more coverage on ZDNet Australia, click here.

  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendly
  • Post Comment

Did you find this article useful?
49 out of 107 people found this useful


Full Talkback thread

0 comments


Company/Topic Alerts

Create a new alert from the list below:






Loading Video Player ....

Featured Talkback

There will be further activation issues to watch out for as Microsoft plans to offer a similar service to independent software vendors whereby they can "control" licensing through activation and other measures similar to the Software Protection Platform.

By: DefenceIT

Read full story:
Microsoft outage down to 'human error'

Sentry Posts Blog

Nasa and the virus

Yesterday the BBC ran a story about a computer virus making it into orbit, which I read with incredulity. OK, it's a nice silly season story on the surface, but what really got me was... More

3 comments

Customer data found on eBay server hig...

The recent news about customer details being retrieved from a server sold on eBay is yet another story about the sorry state of information security in the electronic age (see: http://news.zdnet.co.uk/...m).... More

Post a comment

Does it matter if you are an aardvark...

In spam terms, apparently it does. According to Cambridge University security expert Richard Clayton, if your email address is aardvark at animal.net, you are more likely to receive... More

5 comments