ZDNet UK


Skip to Main Content

ZDNet.co.uk - Winner of Best Business Website 2007
  1. Home
  2. News
  3. Blogs
  4. Reviews
  5. Prices
  6. Resources
  7. Community
  8. My ZDNet

 

ZDNet UK RSS Feeds


IT Jobs

Industry watch Toolkit

Salesforce.com delays IPO

Dawn Kawamoto CNET News.com

Published: 18 May 2004 08:25 BST

  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendly
  • Post Comment

Salesforce.com has delayed its high-profile initial public offering, which had been set for next week, according to sources.

The customer relationship management software vendor was initially set to go public during the week of 24 May, but the debut has been put on hold, said sources. The company is likely to go public with its stock sometime next month.

"It'll be less than a month's delay," one source said. "It's a pretty insignificant delay."

Salesforce.com chairman, CEO and founder Marc Benioff were profiled in a lengthy New York Times article on 9 May, covering Benioff's background, the birth of his company and his charitable work. In the article, Benioff side-stepped questions relating to the pending IPO because the US Securities and Exchange Commission enforces a "quiet period" ahead of a stock offering.

But because the article was a high-profile piece and published within two weeks of the company's IPO date, the SEC and Salesforce.com "reached a mutual agreement" to delay the offering, a source said.

The delay recalls another SEC-imposed cooling-off period on a dot-com IPO. In 1999, the SEC delayed Webvan's offering for a month after allegations that Webvan executives told analysts information not included in its prospectus.

Salesforce.com was also featured in a smaller New York Times article on Friday, which raised questions about Benioff selling his own shares prior to the company's anticipated IPO -- without disclosing when he sold the shares or to whom in the IPO filing.

"The delay wasn't related to the second story," a source said. "The reporter didn't uncover anything the SEC didn't already know about."

David Menlow, president of the IPO Financial Network, said Benioff's sale of his personal shares raised questions.

"We need to know the details of his sale, before conjecture runs out of control on who he sold to and why," Menlow said. "Why would a principal sell his own shares, rather than company-owned stock?"

In at least one instance, Benioff sold some of his personal shares to a person affiliated with the company to avoid further diluting the company's shares, a source said.

The decision to push back the IPO follows an earlier delay from the SEC. Last month, an SEC review of the IPO filing was prolonged by accounting issues. The agency required the company to apply its current accounting methods to its past financial statements in an "apples-to-apples" comparison.

CNET News.com's Paul Festa contributed to this report.

  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendly Print with Dell

Did you find this article useful?
59 out of 146 people found this useful


Full Talkback thread

0 comments


Company/Topic Alerts

Create a new alert from the list below:






Related Jobs

Market Risk IT - Business Analyst - Tier 1 Bank, VAR **

The department is a 70 strong group based in London, New York and Singapore. This is a high profile role working on the next generation of Market ...

Associate Director-London-Equity Derivatives-100,000

London, New York and Hong Kong. Newly recruiting for this high profile, high value front office role needed for an international investment bank ...

BUSINESS ANALYST / TECHNICAL PROJECT MANAGER

BUSINESS ANALYST / TECHNICAL PROJECT MANAGER Concep are a mid-sized marketing technology and services company based in West London, with offices in ...

Featured Talkback

When all is said, if Microsoft produce the best product people will buy it and thats a good thing. If people have to buy their product because no one else can produce an alternative, only because interoperability protocols are kept secret, then thats a bad thing.

By: pround

Read full story:
EU court crushes Microsoft's antitrust appeal