Advertisement
Promo

Compliance Toolkit

Sharman continues file-sharing evidence fight

Abby Dinham ZDNet Australia

Published: 12 May 2004 10:50 BST

  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendly
  • Post Comment

Sharman Networks and the Music Industry Piracy Investigation (MIPI) will be back in the Australian Federal court later this week for yet another legal contest over access to evidence that was confiscated in raids last February.

MIPI, which is investigating the allegations of music copyright infringement against Sharman Networks, today claimed the software company was in defiance of court orders handed down last February giving it access to the evidence.

Sharman Networks, the owner and distributor of the peer-to-peer file sharing program Kazaa, was ordered to schedule times to allow MIPI to see the evidence.

Sharman has until Friday to produce a schedule of times giving MIPI access to the evidence; however, the investigation company's general manager, Michael Speck, claims the software provider will not meet the deadline.

"The last time we were in court his honour said that we must have access to the material by the 14 May, and they have not obliged us with access," said Speck.

Speck claims Sharman Networks will apply for a review of the access terms on Friday. However, he opined that the court would be "unlikely to be sympathetic to [Sharman's] appeal" if it missed the Friday deadline.

MIPI seized the evidence from the premises of Sharman Network's and a number of associated companies in accordance with an Anton Piller order it secured from the federal court on 6 February. The documents were taken to support MIPI's claim that Sharman is liable for copyright infringements carried out by users of its file-sharing program, Kazaa.

Sharman has lobbied the court on several occasions to have the evidence made inadmissible; Speck today opined that the company's latest actions show the evidence must not be favourable to their case.

"We can't see any other reason why they are so vigorously avoiding giving us access to any of the material," said Speck. "This shows an absurd desperation to keep the evidence from us."

ZDNet Australia's Abby Dinham reported from Sydney. For more coverage on ZDNet Australia, click here.

  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendlyPrint with EPSON

Did you find this article useful?
63 out of 99 people found this useful


Full Talkback thread

1 comment

  1. THIS STORY HAS CONFUSED ME SENCE I FIRST READ ABOU... J.ROCKKEER

Company/Topic Alerts

Create a new alert from the list below:





Video icon

Video

Cloud Watch Special Report

Five cloud computing myths exploded

Five cloud computing myths exploded

Analysis The cloud is providing a fertile habitat for the marketeers and their exaggerated claims. We examine the hokum and debunk the five most frequently peddled misconceptions about the cloud

More Special Reports

Sentry Posts Blog

This Crap Site

How utterly stupid - I am ranked #40 in the top 100 - as a member of this site..... I mean HOW utterly stupid.... I have done sweet FA, I have only rejoined this site after a 3 or... More

Post a comment

Microsoft Security Update: November Pa...

Apologies for this late update to our core Patch Tuesday update. Here is a summary of the update .... The November Patch Tuesday update from Microsoft follows the largest patch and... More

Post a comment

DNA details of innocent will be kept f...

The government has announced that it plans to keep innocent people's DNA details for up to six years. In response to a consultation it launched last December, the government said... More

4 comments


Skip Sub Navigation Links to CNET Brand Links

Help

Become part of the ZDNet community.

Newsletters