Advertisement
Promo

Management Toolkit

Ballmer and McNealy play buddies

Ina Fried and Stephen Shankland CNET News

Published: 05 Apr 2004 11:25 BST

  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendly
  • Post Comment

After years of jabbing at one another, Microsoft and Sun Microsystems set aside their punching gloves on Friday, agreeing to a 10-year deal that will see the two companies collaborating on a variety of topics and Microsoft forking over $1.6bn (£0.88bn) to its longtime rival.

In an interview in San Francisco with ZDNet UK sister site CNET News.com, Microsoft chief executive Steve Ballmer and Sun chief executive Scott McNealy talked about the deal, what it means for competitors, whether Scott will stop making fun of Steve and who might really deserve credit for initiating it.

Q: What does this partnership mean for IBM?
Ballmer: We have different kinds of relationships with IBM. IBM is a customer of ours. We've done some work on Web services with IBM; Sun's done a lot of work with IBM. In the enterprise, Microsoft is a player with a growing presence; Sun is a player with a growing presence; IBM is a player. In a sense, IBM has always had the biggest presence around. We're not sure what it's going to mean for IBM. Customers are going to decide that.

McNealy: Let's be fair. We would be absolutely thrilled to death if this made [happy] the customer who wants choice -- who wants a couple of vendors; not just one. We'd be thrilled to death if it were the two of us (gaining business), and IBM didn't make the short list. That's not a problem for either of us. We're OK with that. So let's just be honest about that.

Q: IBM is obviously a big competitor, if not the biggest one, for both companies. Is this going to put pressure on IBM?
Ballmer: Yes.

McNealy: We wouldn't have done it if it didn't.

Q: Why couldn't you do this, say, three years ago, when you settled the Java lawsuit?
Ballmer: The world of 2001 was discombobulated, frankly, because of the bubble and everything else.

McNealy: Post-bubble, we were busy.

Ballmer: In a sense, the world is in a more consistent place than it was in 2001. We've had time to digest where we are. Frankly, it took somebody taking some initiative out of the box, which I complement Scott for taking last year.

Next

Previous

1 2 3


  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendlyPrint with EPSON

Did you find this article useful?
113 out of 213 people found this useful


Full Talkback thread

0 comments


Company/Topic Alerts

Create a new alert from the list below:




Video icon

Video

Discussions

Shibley R Shibley R

Eigg

Sunday 27 December 2009, 1:04 PM

1 comment
Tezzer Tezzer

Nice to see but...

Saturday 26 December 2009, 10:28 AM

5 comments
NoThomas NoThomas

Sure I can

Saturday 26 December 2009, 2:01 AM

11 comments

Skip Sub Navigation Links to CNET Brand Links

Help

Become part of the ZDNet community.

Newsletters