ZDNet UK


Skip to Main Content

ZDNet.co.uk - Winner of Best Business Website 2007
  1. Home
  2. News
  3. Blogs
  4. Reviews
  5. Prices
  6. Resources
  7. Community
  8. My ZDNet

 

ZDNet UK RSS Feeds


IT Jobs

Industry watch Toolkit

Shareholder anger ahead of Symbian vote

Graeme Wearden ZDNet.co.uk

Published: 12 Mar 2004 11:45 GMT

  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendly
  • Post Comment

A group of Psion shareholders who are battling to prevent Nokia buying Psion's 31 percent stake in Symbian have claimed that City institutions aren't examining the proposal in enough detail.

These small shareholders believe that rather than selling out to Nokia, Psion should instead push for Symbian's flotation. Opponents of the sale claim that an IPO would generate much more money for shareholders. They are accusing institutional stockholders -- such as pension funds and tracker funds -- of apathy and ignorance ahead of Friday's vote on the proposed sale of Psion's stake in Symbian.

"Large institutional shareholders are under pressure from the government to actively exercise their votes. It sounds like a good thing. Unfortunately these institutions have only limited resources available and simply run down a list of 'good governance' checkboxes," said one Psion shareholder. "Once these are ticked off, they automatically vote with management as they simply don't have the resources to examine whether management's intentions will actually create shareholder value."

Psion chairman David Potter, who owns 12 percent of the company's stock, has already said he will vote in favour of selling Psion's stake to Nokia for an estimated £135.7m. If most institutional investors also support the sale, then the proposal appears likely to be passed at Psion's extraordinary general meeting on Friday.

Rebellious Psion shareholders also claim that some private investors aren't even in a position to take part in the vote. In some cases, they say, this is because the shares are held through a broker -- who may never pass on details about the vote. Several private investors claim to have encountered significant resistance when attempting to get hold of their voting forms. It's thought that this could be because some brokers don't want to incur the costs involved with putting voting systems in place.

  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendly Print with Dell

Did you find this article useful?
60 out of 104 people found this useful


Full Talkback thread

0 comments


Company/Topic Alerts

Create a new alert from the list below:







Related Jobs

Cisco Certified Internetwork Expert CCIE CCIE CCIE CCIE CCIE CCIE CCIE

The successful candidate will be offered exposure to a full project cycle, involving pre-sale, design, test, implementation and support,. Further ...

Business Analyst ( OO , Java ) - London

Wachovia, Bear Stearns, Sumitomo Trust, BNP Paribas, Barclays Global Investors and Wells Fargo. Calypso provides a single turn-key Java-based ...

Symbian Developer - C++ - Contract - URGENT

Huxley Associates reputable central London based client have the requirement for a Symbian Developer for a 3-6 month contract. Key words - Symbian, ...

Featured Talkback

When all is said, if Microsoft produce the best product people will buy it and thats a good thing. If people have to buy their product because no one else can produce an alternative, only because interoperability protocols are kept secret, then thats a bad thing.

By: pround

Read full story:
EU court crushes Microsoft's antitrust appeal