ZDNet UK


Skip to Main Content

ZDNet.co.uk - Winner of Best Business Website 2007
  1. Home
  2. News
  3. Blogs
  4. Reviews
  5. Prices
  6. Resources
  7. Community
  8. My ZDNet

 

ZDNet UK RSS Feeds


IT Jobs

Industry watch Toolkit

Oracle 'remains committed' to PeopleSoft bid

Alorie Gilbert CNET News.com

Published: 25 Nov 2003 09:45 GMT

  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendly
  • Post Comment

Oracle remains committed to acquiring PeopleSoft despite a number of obstacles and a protracted regulatory review of the proposed merger, Oracle executives said on Monday.

On a conference call for securities analysts, three top Oracle executives emphasised their resolve to complete the unsolicited deal and accused PeopleSoft management of eroding the value of the company with a controversial money-back guarantee programme.

"We remain committed to acquiring PeopleSoft," Oracle executive vice president Chuck Phillips said. "There is no merit to the proposition that the deal is dead."

The call followed recent media reports speculating that the US Department of Justice may challenge the deal and that PeopleSoft's revised guarantee programme could deter Oracle.

Oracle plans to finish submitting information for the Justice Department's antitrust review in the next few weeks and expects a decision from the regulatory body in January, executive vice president Safra Catz said on the call. Oracle also expects the European Commission, the Justice Department's counterpart in Europe, will take less than the four months it's allowed to issue a ruling under its extended review process, she added.

The company also plans to nominate an alternative slate of directors for PeopleSoft's board in January in order to comply with PeopleSoft's new shortened nomination deadline, Catz said. A shareholder vote on the board seats is scheduled for the company's next shareholders meeting in June.

Oracle chief financial officer Jeff Henley accused PeopleSoft executives of obscuring PeopleSoft's financial performance to boost shareholder support for its merger with J.D. Edwards. Henley also said PeopleSoft may have improperly accounted for revenue during its third quarter because of the way it revised its customer rebate programme. The programme, which PeopleSoft started in June, would refund customers as much as five times the cost of their software if a company were to acquire PeopleSoft and discontinue its products.

In an October filing to Securities and Exchange Commission, PeopleSoft said it had amended the programme, making it possible to trigger refunds without PeopleSoft being acquired. PeopleSoft should not have recognised revenue under the new refund conditions, Oracle argued.

"We believe they have a revenue recognition problem," Henley said.

PeopleSoft said it never actually made itself liable for the refunds in its customer contracts, but had misworded a description of the revised plan in a filing with the SEC. The company has corrected the mistake in the filing, said DeeAnna McPherson, a PeopleSoft spokeswoman.

"We're very confident that our revenue has been recognised appropriately," McPherson said.

  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendly Print with Dell

Did you find this article useful?
93 out of 145 people found this useful


Full Talkback thread

0 comments

Company/Topic Alerts

Create a new alert from the list below:






Related Jobs

Head of Sales and Customer Relations

The addition of Digiplugs expertise in digital content distribution will build on Accentures leadership in digital media solutions with a recognised, ...

Associate Director of Business Intelligence

The hospitals are some of the most technologically advanced in the country, with state of the art medical and diagnostic equipment ensuring that our ...

2x Change Analysts - 12 month Fixed Term - Finance - Glasgow - to 27k

With a very aggressive programme of change planned and currently in progress, my Glasgow based-client is a large financial organisation. Lead Change ...

Discussions

319762 319762

Eve of Distraction

Saturday 26 July 2008, 4:37 AM

1 comment

Featured Talkback

When all is said, if Microsoft produce the best product people will buy it and thats a good thing. If people have to buy their product because no one else can produce an alternative, only because interoperability protocols are kept secret, then thats a bad thing.

By: pround

Read full story:
EU court crushes Microsoft's antitrust appeal