ZDNet UK


Skip to Main Content

ZDNet.co.uk - Winner of Best Business Website 2007
  1. Home
  2. News
  3. Blogs
  4. Reviews
  5. Prices
  6. Resources
  7. Community
  8. My ZDNet

 

ZDNet UK RSS Feeds


IT Jobs

Industry watch Toolkit

Americans demand anti-spam register

Lisa M Bowman CNET News.com

Published: 24 Jul 2003 11:20 BST

  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendly
  • Post Comment

Americans overwhelmingly support a do-not-spam list, according to a new study released on Wednesday by privacy consultant and anti-spam software seller ePrivacy Group.

The company's 2003 Consumer Spam Study found that 74 percent of consumers want a federal do-not-spam list similar to the do-not-call list that goes into effect this fall. What's more, 79 percent said they want laws to ban or limit spam.

The study surveyed about 1,090 adults in the United States asking them their thoughts about how to define spam and what they think can be done to quash it. It was released during a press conference by Senator Charles Schumer, sponsor of a bill that would create a do-not-spam list, which is one of several anti-spam measures currently in Congress.

"The emailing public has been at the mercy of spammers for way too long," Schumer said in a statement. "This survey confirms that people are screaming out to be empowered with the ability to stop the constant flow of unsolicited emails into their in-boxes."

Most people who responded to the survey said that current anti-spam measures, such as filtering and opting out, don't appear to work. In fact, 37 percent of consumers said they don't use the opt-out mechanism because they fear that it won't work or will confirm their email address for spammers.

The study also found that people define spam as email from a business that they do not have an existing business relationship with. A full 70 percent said it is acceptable to receive email from companies they've done business with offline, while four out of five said it is acceptable for such companies to send them emails about order fulfilment.

Still, more than 31 percent of respondents said they would reject messages from nonprofits.

As for taking action against spammers, most respondents said they think civil lawsuits provide the best recourse. They also favoured federal laws over anti-spam action at the state level.


For everything Internet-related, from the latest legal and policy-related news, to domain name updates, see ZDNet UK's Internet News Section.

Let the editors know what you think in the Mailroom.

  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendly Print with Dell

Did you find this article useful?
58 out of 78 people found this useful


Full Talkback thread

0 comments


Company/Topic Alerts

Create a new alert from the list below:










Related Jobs

Flash Action Script Developers Contract - Merseyside

Flash Action Script Developers Merseyside My client based in Merseyside seeks two talented freelance Flash and ActionScript developers. Key Skills ...

McAffee Anti-Virus Rollout Engineer (Field Based)

My West Midlands based client has a requirement for 2 Engineers to rollout McAfee Anti-Virus on to 600+ desktops at multiple sites throughout the ...

Project Manager - Baseline Implementation Manager (IT Manager)- ITIL - North West

Focusing on the needs of our customers and consumers Getting to know the world outside Unilever Building external relationships which benefit the ...

Discussions

David Long David Long

Defragging: Merits?

Thursday 24 July 2008, 10:30 AM

12 posts

Featured Talkback

When all is said, if Microsoft produce the best product people will buy it and thats a good thing. If people have to buy their product because no one else can produce an alternative, only because interoperability protocols are kept secret, then thats a bad thing.

By: pround

Read full story:
EU court crushes Microsoft's antitrust appeal