ZDNet UK


Skip to Main Content

ZDNet.co.uk - Winner of Best Business Website 2007
  1. Home
  2. News
  3. Blogs
  4. Reviews
  5. Prices
  6. Resources
  7. Community
  8. My ZDNet

 

ZDNet UK RSS Feeds


IT Jobs

Industry watch Toolkit

Microsoft set to refund $1bn

Declan McCullagh, CNET News.com CNET News.com

Published: 21 Jul 2003 07:47 BST

  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendly
  • Post Comment

A California judge on Friday gave preliminary approval to a landmark settlement under which Microsoft will pay $1.1bn (£690m) to settle a class-action suit that claimed it overcharged consumers for Windows.

The ruling by San Francisco superior court judge Paul Alvarado allows the settlement to proceed to the next step, during which consumers and corporations in the state will be notified that they may qualify for vouchers ranging in value from $5 to $29. The vouchers can be used to buy most hardware or software products from any manufacturer.

Townsend and Townsend and Crew, the law firm that filed the suit, described Friday's ruling as "the largest recovery of a monopoly overcharge ever achieved in the United States and the largest recovery ever achieved under the antitrust laws of California."

Eugene Crew, a partner at the San Francisco-based law firm, said that the ruling means consumers will start to be notified.

"It'll start in 60 days and continue for 60 days after that," Crew said. "These will be notices in newspapers and magazines and notices to those people whose email or direct mail addresses we have. We've been getting those records from Microsoft and (computer makers)."

Nobody can submit claims until two months from now, at which time Alvarado is expected to approve the exact wording of the public notification of the settlement.

Microsoft could not immediately be reached for comment.

The lawsuit, filed in February 1999, claimed that Microsoft violated California antitrust laws by overcharging by as much as $40 for every copy of the Windows 95 and 98 operating systems.

People seeking refunds will be able to go to MicrosoftCalSettlement.com or call (800) 203-9995 to request a claim form. In addition, Townsend and Townsend and Crew has set up a settlement FAQ Web site. The settlement affects individuals and businesses in California that bought Windows or certain Microsoft application software -- including MSDOS or Windows software obtained as part of the purchase of a computer -- between 18 February, 1995 and 15 December, 2001.

Two-thirds of the unclaimed money will go to California public schools in a mix of donated Microsoft software and cash grants. Although the maximum value of the settlement is $1.1bn, Microsoft could end up paying as little as $367 million in cash, which is what it would owe to California public schools if no vouchers are claimed. If all vouchers are claimed, Microsoft would be required to pay the maximum, but schools would then get nothing.

During the next four months, people who object to the settlement can submit paperwork to the court. Judge Alvarado has scheduled a follow-up hearing for 13 February, 2004, according to Crew, to review the implementation of the settlement and then approve or reject it.

Microsoft isn't the first technology company ordered to pay large sums after finding itself a class-action defendant. In 1999, Toshiba settled a billion-dollar class-action lawsuit that arose from claims that the company had sold notebooks with defective floppy drives. Immediately after the settlement, the same lawyers that pursued Toshiba sued Compaq Computer, Emachines, Hewlett-Packard, NEC and Packard Bell NEC.


See the Windows News Section for the latest news, reviews and briefing papers on everything from Windows NT and 95 to service pack releases for XP.

Let the editors know what you think in the Mailroom.

  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendly Print with Dell

Did you find this article useful?
50 out of 85 people found this useful


Full Talkback thread

0 comments

Company/Topic Alerts

Create a new alert from the list below:







Related Jobs

IBM SAN Storage Architect - DS8100 - SVC

IBM SAN Storage Architect for finance client based in the City. Candidates should possess expert knowledge of storage area networks (SAN); showing ...

Flash Action Script Developers Merseyside - Contract

Key Skills Great Flash/ActionScript ability, with 2-3 years professional experience The capacity to create sophisticated class-based applications ...

Key Account Sales Manager/Sales- SAN/NAS Storage, Netapp IP SAN, EMC

Key Account Sales Manager/Sales- SAN/NAS Storage, Netapp IPSAN FC SAN, EMC Clarion, Data Domain, Pillar, Isilon, 3Par, Onstore, My client is a ...

Discussions

David Long David Long

Defragging: Merits?

Thursday 24 July 2008, 10:30 AM

12 posts

Featured Talkback

When all is said, if Microsoft produce the best product people will buy it and thats a good thing. If people have to buy their product because no one else can produce an alternative, only because interoperability protocols are kept secret, then thats a bad thing.

By: pround

Read full story:
EU court crushes Microsoft's antitrust appeal