ZDNet UK


Skip to Main Content

ZDNet.co.uk - Winner of Best Business Website 2007
  1. Home
  2. News
  3. Blogs
  4. Reviews
  5. Prices
  6. Resources
  7. Community
  8. My ZDNet

 

ZDNet UK RSS Feeds


IT Jobs

Industry watch Toolkit

Lucent loses court case over employee Web site

Matthew Broersma ZDNet.co.uk

Published: 11 Jul 2003 16:56 BST

  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendly
  • Post Comment

A French court has ruled that Lucent Technologies was liable for an illicit Internet site created by one of the company's employees, because the worker created the site on company time and with equipment provided by Lucent.

The controversial decision, issued by the Tribunal de Grande Instance de Marseille on 11 June, found in favour of Escota, a roads authority for southern France. Escota had sued Nicolas Breil, his employer Lucent and Web hosting service Multimania, now owned by Lycos.

The case revolved around a site created by Breil to air his grievances about Escota and its road tolls. The site, called Escroca, used a logo based on Escota's, with added visual elements "of a sexual nature", the court said. Escroca is a pun on the term "escroc", or "swindler".

The court found that the site constituted a "brand forgery" because of its use of the Escota trademark; the defence that the site was satirical was thrown out because the use of the trademark "was not guided by the intention to amuse... but was motivated by hateful sentiments." Lucent was also found responsible because Breil created the site on company time, using company equipment.

Under French law, the employer would ordinarily be exempt from responsibility if the employee were acting outside the limits of his job and without company authorisation. However, the court ruled that Breil's acts were effectively within the limits of his terms of employment because, in part, "the free consultation of Internet sites was authorised" by the employer and, in part, because "no specific interdiction had been formulated against the creation of Web sites or the supply of information on personal pages."

Lucent and Breil were ordered to pay up to 4,000 euros to Escota for the publication of the decision in two national French newspapers, and Breil was also ordered to pay a symbolic one euro penalty.


See the Digital Rights News Section for the latest on copy protection, piracy, DVD recording and your rights online.

Let the editors know what you think in the Mailroom.

  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendly Print with Dell

Did you find this article useful?
47 out of 100 people found this useful


Full Talkback thread

0 comments

Company/Topic Alerts

Create a new alert from the list below:







Related Jobs

SAP SD CONSULTANT - SAP SD Implementation Proj.-Weybridge-50000K+Bens

The successful candidate will provide support for Supply chain system including development & maintenance, through the use of the SAP SD module and ...

NETWORK ADMINISTRATOR

NETWORK ADMINISTRATOR 25,000 30,000 per annum, dependent on experience Location: Coalville, Leicestershire Reporting to the IT Manager, your main ...

CISCO NOC Network Operations Manager - ISP - Manchester - >40k

Major technology focused ISP requires skilled Cisco based NOC manager to take responsibility for the day to day running of a major ISPs Network ...

Featured Talkback

When all is said, if Microsoft produce the best product people will buy it and thats a good thing. If people have to buy their product because no one else can produce an alternative, only because interoperability protocols are kept secret, then thats a bad thing.

By: pround

Read full story:
EU court crushes Microsoft's antitrust appeal