Advertisement
Promo

Industry watch Toolkit

Microsoft probed on Linux retaliation

Declan McCullagh, CNET News.com CNET News

Published: 08 Jul 2003 07:56 BST

  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendly
  • Post Comment

The Massachusetts attorney general's office is investigating whether Microsoft tried to squash Linux in violation of the consent decree settling the company's landmark antitrust case.

Massachusetts, the only state still pursuing antitrust charges against the software maker, said in a court filing that it "is looking at several issues related to potential enforcement of the decree." These include whether Microsoft has retaliated against an unspecified computer maker for promoting Linux and has signed unlawfully restrictive agreements with Internet service providers.

The software giant has targeted Linux, an open-source operating system, as a significant challenger to the status of its own proprietary software.

A Microsoft representative denied the allegations. "Microsoft's compliance is being closely monitored, and the consent decree is being closely enforced," spokesman Jim Desler said on Monday.

"It's a curious filing, considering that there are several layers of enforcement over Microsoft's implementation of the consent decree," Desler said. "You have strict internal enforcement. You have Microsoft board enforcement as well. Externally you have the Department of Justice and the settling states. And you have the court."

Thomas Reilly, the Massachusetts attorney general, said in an eight-page document dated 3 July and made available on Monday that other states have not been sufficiently helpful in identifying potential wrongdoing on Microsoft's part. "Given the current state of affairs, Massachusetts has begun its own efforts to identify potential decree violations," the document said, without providing any details.

The US Justice Department, which was a party to the consent decree, said in its own filing last week that competitors have been complaining about prices that Microsoft plans to charge to allow access to Windows' innards. In response, the Justice Department said it remains "concerned" about the fees.

Massachusetts' appeal of US Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly's final remedies directed against Microsoft is scheduled to be heard 4 November.


See ZDNet UK's DoJ/Microsoft News Section for the latest developments on Microsoft's legal entanglements.

Let the editors know what you think in the Mailroom.

  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendlyPrint with EPSON

Did you find this article useful?
76 out of 170 people found this useful


Full Talkback thread

0 comments

Company/Topic Alerts

Create a new alert from the list below:






Discussions

J.A. Watson J.A. Watson

Bumbling Imbeciles? Yes.

Thursday 17 December 2009, 6:57 AM

3 comments
CA CA

Well..

Thursday 17 December 2009, 12:51 AM

3 comments
CA CA

The sooner...

Thursday 17 December 2009, 12:42 AM

1 comment
CA CA

aye..

Thursday 17 December 2009, 12:30 AM

4 comments
Video icon

Video

Featured Talkback

In association with Network Liberation Movement
When all is said, if Microsoft produce the best product people will buy it and thats a good thing. If people have to buy their product because no one else can produce an alternative, only because interoperability protocols are kept secret, then thats a bad thing.

By: pround

Read full story:
EU court crushes Microsoft's antitrust appeal


Skip Sub Navigation Links to CNET Brand Links

Help

Become part of the ZDNet community.

Newsletters