ZDNet UK


Skip to Main Content

ZDNet.co.uk - Winner of Best Business Website 2007
  1. Home
  2. News
  3. Blogs
  4. Reviews
  5. Prices
  6. Resources
  7. Community
  8. My ZDNet

 

ZDNet UK RSS Feeds


IT Jobs

Industry watch Toolkit

Microsoft probed on Linux retaliation

Declan McCullagh, CNET News.com CNET News.com

Published: 08 Jul 2003 07:56 BST

  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendly
  • Post Comment

The Massachusetts attorney general's office is investigating whether Microsoft tried to squash Linux in violation of the consent decree settling the company's landmark antitrust case.

Massachusetts, the only state still pursuing antitrust charges against the software maker, said in a court filing that it "is looking at several issues related to potential enforcement of the decree." These include whether Microsoft has retaliated against an unspecified computer maker for promoting Linux and has signed unlawfully restrictive agreements with Internet service providers.

The software giant has targeted Linux, an open-source operating system, as a significant challenger to the status of its own proprietary software.

A Microsoft representative denied the allegations. "Microsoft's compliance is being closely monitored, and the consent decree is being closely enforced," spokesman Jim Desler said on Monday.

"It's a curious filing, considering that there are several layers of enforcement over Microsoft's implementation of the consent decree," Desler said. "You have strict internal enforcement. You have Microsoft board enforcement as well. Externally you have the Department of Justice and the settling states. And you have the court."

Thomas Reilly, the Massachusetts attorney general, said in an eight-page document dated 3 July and made available on Monday that other states have not been sufficiently helpful in identifying potential wrongdoing on Microsoft's part. "Given the current state of affairs, Massachusetts has begun its own efforts to identify potential decree violations," the document said, without providing any details.

The US Justice Department, which was a party to the consent decree, said in its own filing last week that competitors have been complaining about prices that Microsoft plans to charge to allow access to Windows' innards. In response, the Justice Department said it remains "concerned" about the fees.

Massachusetts' appeal of US Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly's final remedies directed against Microsoft is scheduled to be heard 4 November.


See ZDNet UK's DoJ/Microsoft News Section for the latest developments on Microsoft's legal entanglements.

Let the editors know what you think in the Mailroom.

  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendly
  • Post Comment

Did you find this article useful?
75 out of 168 people found this useful


Full Talkback thread

0 comments

Company/Topic Alerts

Create a new alert from the list below:






Discussions

1000262163 1000262163

Time the law was applied!

Thursday 21 August 2008, 9:51 PM

1 comment
Yellowcave Yellowcave

Goes against their current position.

Thursday 21 August 2008, 5:42 PM

1 comment

Featured Talkback

When all is said, if Microsoft produce the best product people will buy it and thats a good thing. If people have to buy their product because no one else can produce an alternative, only because interoperability protocols are kept secret, then thats a bad thing.

By: pround

Read full story:
EU court crushes Microsoft's antitrust appeal