Advertisement
Promo

Industry watch Toolkit

PeopleSoft spurns Oracle a second time

Margaret Kane CNET News

Published: 20 Jun 2003 14:25 BST

  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendly
  • Post Comment

PeopleSoft's board of directors has again rejected Oracle's attempt to buy the company, saying that even though the price is higher, it's still not enough.

The board of the business-software maker also asserted that such a merger would face "substantial regulatory delays and a significant likelihood that the transaction would be prohibited." Oracle also competes in the enterprise software market. Combined, the two companies would likely be second only to Germany's SAP in the business software market.

Earlier this week, Oracle increased its offer for PeopleSoft from $5.1bn (£3.04bn) to $6.3bn. PeopleSoft had formally rejected the earlier bid, on essentially the same grounds.

The hostile takeover has let loose several lawsuits among the companies. Connecticut's attorney general has also filed suit against Oracle, asserting that the bid would "directly damage the state and its economy and raise prices... by significantly reducing competition in the markets PeopleSoft serves."

Connecticut Attorney General Richard Blumenthal said on Thursday that his office has met with Oracle executives and received a letter from Oracle chief executive Larry Ellison. But the sales pitch does not appear to be working.

"Nothing we have learned so far has diminished our determination to pursue this antitrust enforcement action," Blumenthal said in Thursday's statement.

Meanwhile PeopleSoft has moved forward with its own bid to acquire J.D. Edwards. PeopleSoft recently sweetened its bid for J.D. Edwards. On Thursday, PeopleSoft initiated the formal exchange offer for the merger.


For a round-up of the latest tech business coverage, see the Business News Section.

Let the editors know what you think in the Mailroom.

  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendlyPrint with EPSON

Did you find this article useful?
127 out of 227 people found this useful


Full Talkback thread

0 comments

Company/Topic Alerts

Create a new alert from the list below:








Discussions

46317 46317

And???

Thursday 17 December 2009, 3:08 PM

2 comments
lezlow lezlow

not fussy

Thursday 17 December 2009, 1:59 PM

1 comment
lezlow lezlow

Steorn's perpetual motion machine. Bat...

Thursday 17 December 2009, 1:56 PM

9 comments
Video icon

Video

Featured Talkback

In association with Network Liberation Movement
When all is said, if Microsoft produce the best product people will buy it and thats a good thing. If people have to buy their product because no one else can produce an alternative, only because interoperability protocols are kept secret, then thats a bad thing.

By: pround

Read full story:
EU court crushes Microsoft's antitrust appeal


Skip Sub Navigation Links to CNET Brand Links

Help

Become part of the ZDNet community.

Newsletters