ZDNet UK


Skip to Main Content

ZDNet.co.uk - Winner of Best Business Website 2007
  1. Home
  2. News
  3. Blogs
  4. Reviews
  5. Prices
  6. Resources
  7. Community
  8. My ZDNet

 

ZDNet UK RSS Feeds


IT Jobs

Industry watch Toolkit

Companies told to clamp down on IM use

Munir Kotadia ZDNet.co.uk

Published: 19 Jun 2003 11:23 BST

  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendly
  • Post Comment

Companies are being advised to keep archives of all their IM communications for at least three years. The National Association of Securities Dealers (NASD), the US regulator of the Nasdaq and securities market, told its members to treat instant messages the same way they treat email in response to the growing use of the technology in large companies -- particularly finance houses.

Although IM started life as a chat tool for teenagers, the technology has some real advantages over email for the corporate user. For instance, messages are sent and received immediately with IM, so real-time textual conversations are possible. The ability to see a users' status without actually having to make contact makes collaborative and remote working more user-friendly, and many workers appreciate the lack of a message archive taking up server space. But it is this lack of archiving that is causing concern to the NASD.

"NASD recognises that instant messaging is becoming increasingly popular as a real-time method of communicating and we want to be clear about our expectations for its use," said Mary L. Schapiro, vice chairman and president of Regulatory Policy and Oversight at NASD, in a statement. "Firms have to remember that regardless of the informality of instant messaging, it is still subject to the same requirements as email communications and members must ensure that their use of instant messaging is consistent with their basic supervisory and record keeping obligations," she added.

The use of IM in the corporate market has become common, especially since the likes of Yahoo, Microsoft and Sun Microsystems have launched corporate-specific IM products. But unregulated use of free IM products is rife in many companies.

Free IM products aimed at consumers -- such as Yahoo or MSN Messenger -- usually provide some sort of archive functionality, but unlike email, the company does not have enough power to monitor and save all communications.

The NASD has advised its members to treat IM communications the same way they treat written letters and emails. If this is not possible, the regulator recommends a complete ban on IM communications between staff and clients.

NASD's comments about companies putting a stop to their employees using free IM packages are expected to boost sales of corporate IM products.


For everything Internet-related, from the latest legal and policy-related news, to domain name updates, see ZDNet UK's Internet News Section.

Let the editors know what you think in the Mailroom.

  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendly Print with Dell

Did you find this article useful?
48 out of 101 people found this useful


Full Talkback thread

0 comments


Company/Topic Alerts

Create a new alert from the list below:











Related Jobs

Policy Manager wanted now!

I am looking for an experienced Policy Manager for my local government client for an immediate start. Essential skills: ** Change Management skills ...

Application Support - SWIFT Messaging - London UNIX SHELL PERMANENT

Top Tier Investment Bank is seeking a Product Engineer to join their Applications Management group. The successful candidate will have extremely ...

Messaging Support Analyst (AD,TREND protection,Exchange) BANKING

Highly Prestigious Investment Bank is hiring a Senior Level Messaging Support Analyst to join a small team in supporting the global messaging & ...

Discussions

David Long David Long

Defragging: Merits?

Thursday 24 July 2008, 10:30 AM

12 posts

Featured Talkback

When all is said, if Microsoft produce the best product people will buy it and thats a good thing. If people have to buy their product because no one else can produce an alternative, only because interoperability protocols are kept secret, then thats a bad thing.

By: pround

Read full story:
EU court crushes Microsoft's antitrust appeal