ZDNet UK


Skip to Main Content

ZDNet.co.uk - Winner of Best Business Website 2007
  1. Home
  2. News
  3. Blogs
  4. Reviews
  5. Prices
  6. Resources
  7. Community
  8. My ZDNet

 

ZDNet UK RSS Feeds


IT Jobs

Industry watch Toolkit

Oracle boosts PeopleSoft bid

Margaret Kane CNET News.com

Published: 18 Jun 2003 12:46 BST

  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendly
  • Post Comment

Oracle has raised its takeover bid for PeopleSoft to $19.50 per share, valuing the software company at $6.3bn (£3.73bn).

Oracle also filed a suit against PeopleSoft and J.D. Edwards, the application software maker that PeopleSoft has announced plans to acquire.

The move is not unexpected; analysts and industry watchers have been saying that Oracle's initial hostile takeover offer of $16 per share, which valued PeopleSoft at $5.1bn, was surprisingly low.

In a press release issued on Wednesday, Oracle CEO Larry Ellison said his company had been speaking to some of PeopleSoft's majority shareholders who had indicated they needed to see a higher price in order to approve the deal.

"Oracle remains committed to acquiring PeopleSoft and will not be deterred by management's manoeuvres to maintain control of a company they do not own. Contrary to what PeopleSoft management would have you believe, Oracle intends to fully support PeopleSoft customers and products for many years to come," Ellison said in a release. "Satisfying those customers is the key to the success of this acquisition."

Earlier, Ellison had said that Oracle, should it succeed in its acquisition bid, would discontinue PeopleSoft's product line.

Oracle also said it would file a suit on Wednesday in Delaware against PeopleSoft, its board of directors, and J.D. Edwards "in response to their collective efforts to eliminate PeopleSoft shareholders' ability to accept Oracle's tender offer."

Executives at PeopleSoft could not immediately be reached for comment.

"We remain committed to completing the amended definitive merger agreement with PeopleSoft, and we maintain that the Oracle hostile tender offer is disruptive to that agreement," said Victor Chayet, J.D. Edwards' spokesman.

PeopleSoft's board has formally rejected Oracle's bid and PeopleSoft CEO Craig Conway has sent a letter to PeopleSoft customers that called the Oracle offer "predatory." Earlier this week PeopleSoft sweetened its offer for J.D. Edwards in an attempt to stall the Oracle bid.

Last week, J.D. Edwards filed suit against Oracle, saying the takeover bid "tortiously interfered" with its deal with PeopleSoft.

PeopleSoft has also sued Oracle in connection to the hostile takeover bid.

Oracle said it is looking for a rescission of the amended deal between PeopleSoft and J.D. Edwards, and for PeopleSoft to eliminate its "poison pill."


For a round-up of the latest tech business coverage, see the Business News Section.

Let the editors know what you think in the Mailroom.

  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendly Print with Dell

Did you find this article useful?
43 out of 80 people found this useful


Full Talkback thread

0 comments


Company/Topic Alerts

Create a new alert from the list below:





Related Jobs

.NET SOFTWARE DEVELOPERS WANTED! VB.NET/ C#/ ASP.NET- NORWICH- 30,000

We have enjoyed consistent growth and expansion due to the acquisition of reputable contracts in the last 2 years. Progressive deal with 93 of the ...

Price to Win Architect

Interfacing with executive management to defend price position and obtain bid approvals. As part of our Applications Outsourcing workforce, we ...

ASP DEVELOPER WANTED - CLASSIC ASP/ ASP.NET - NORTHAMPTON- 30,000

The role has arisen due to the acquisition of multi million pound projects and will require the successful candidate to manage a team of Classic ASP/ ...

Discussions

319762 319762

Eve of Distraction

Saturday 26 July 2008, 4:37 AM

1 comment

Featured Talkback

When all is said, if Microsoft produce the best product people will buy it and thats a good thing. If people have to buy their product because no one else can produce an alternative, only because interoperability protocols are kept secret, then thats a bad thing.

By: pround

Read full story:
EU court crushes Microsoft's antitrust appeal