Advertisement
Promo

Industry watch Toolkit

J.D. Edwards sues Oracle for $1.7bn

Ian Fried, CNET CNET News

Published: 13 Jun 2003 08:11 BST

  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendly
  • Post Comment

J.D. Edwards said on Thursday that it has filed a $1.7bn (£1bn) lawsuit against Oracle, claiming the database maker has illegally interfered in its proposed merger with PeopleSoft.

In a lawsuit filed in Colorado state court, J.D. Edwards alleges Oracle has "tortiously interfered" with the deal and asks a court for $1.7bn in compensatory damages and an unspecified amount in punitive damages.

J.D. Edwards said it is also filing suit in California state court against Oracle and two of its executives. That suit charges the company, chief executive Larry Ellison and vice president Chuck Phillips with wrongful conduct and unfair business practices. The suit seeks an injunction to prevent Oracle from proceeding with its tender offer for PeopleSoft.

"Oracle's sole aim is to disrupt a merger that will create value for the key stakeholders of J.D. Edwards and PeopleSoft," J.D. Edwards chief executive Bob Dutkowsky said in a statement. "Oracle's unsolicited offer for PeopleSoft will only destroy value for our companies' shareholders, customers and employees and the technology community overall. We will not sit by idly while Oracle pursues this arrogant, unlawful and destructive course of action."

In a statement, Oracle said it had "just heard of this lawsuit" but added it believes the case has "no merit".

"Clearly PeopleSoft and J.D. Edwards prefer to fight in the courts than let shareholders decide," Oracle said.

Earlier on Thursday, PeopleSoft formally rejected the unsolicited bid from Oracle. The company said its board had unanimously voted against the deal and planned to proceed with plans to acquire J.D. Edwards. PeopleSoft on Wednesday filed the necessary documents with government regulators to proceed with its bid.


For a round-up of the latest tech business coverage, see the Business News Section.

Let the editors know what you think in the Mailroom.

  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendlyPrint with EPSON

Did you find this article useful?
47 out of 98 people found this useful


Full Talkback thread

0 comments

Company/Topic Alerts

Create a new alert from the list below:





Discussions

Tezzer Tezzer

The only surprise...

Wednesday 16 December 2009, 1:47 PM

3 comments
ator1940 ator1940

Cloud apps

Wednesday 16 December 2009, 1:33 PM

1 comment
ator1940 ator1940

MS copy?

Wednesday 16 December 2009, 1:25 PM

3 comments
J.A. Watson J.A. Watson

Big Surprise... NOT!

Wednesday 16 December 2009, 12:05 PM

3 comments
Video icon

Video

Featured Talkback

In association with Network Liberation Movement
When all is said, if Microsoft produce the best product people will buy it and thats a good thing. If people have to buy their product because no one else can produce an alternative, only because interoperability protocols are kept secret, then thats a bad thing.

By: pround

Read full story:
EU court crushes Microsoft's antitrust appeal


Skip Sub Navigation Links to CNET Brand Links

Help

Become part of the ZDNet community.

Newsletters