Advertisement
Promo

Industry watch Toolkit

Seagate sets out to shrink storage

John Lui CNet Asia

Published: 21 May 2003 08:43 BST

  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendly
  • Post Comment

Disk drive maker Seagate is out to shrink the storage industry: it wants to replace all drives used in today's servers with smaller units, the same size as those found in notebooks.

"We'd like to emphasize that this is an industry-wide shift to a new platform strategy which Seagate is driving," said Johan Lim, a spokesman for Seagate in Singapore.

The devices -- which the firm has dubbed "2.5-inch enterprise drives" -- will become available next year. The drive maker is working with Hewlett-Packard, Intel and Microsoft to deliver working systems, said a statement.

Smaller drives not only mean space-saving servers, they also give better performance, according to US-based Seagate.

When measured in IOPS (input/outputs per second) -- a method of gauging how much data flows in and out of a drive -- a larger number of smaller drives will give better performance than fewer 3.5-inch drives, the standard used in servers today, said Seagate.

"A 2U rack storage array with 2.5-inch drives will be able to outperform today's common 3U rack storage arrays by nearly 140 percent on an IOPS-per-U basis, while providing equal or greater storage capacity," said the statement.

A "U" is a unit of space on a server rack, with the smallest computers taking up only 1 U.

Seagate is keeping mum about new smaller drives' technical specifications, such as platter rotational speed, data throughput or storage capacity.

Notebooks, very small desktops and some MP3 players today use mobile 2.5-inch drives, but these units resemble the upcoming 2.5-inch enterprise drives only in appearance, said Seagate. Current 2.5-inch drives have platters -- the magnetic media which holds the data -- that spin at a slower 4,200 or 5,400 rpm compared with 7,200 or 10,000 rpm for today's 3.5-inch server drives, and so typically deliver lower performance.

Notebook drives top out at 80GB in storage capacity. Server drives, on the other hand, can exceed 100GB per unit.

In addition, mobile 2.5-inch drives typically feature IDE connection interfaces, while 3.5-inch server drives have SCSI, Fibre Channel or the up-and-coming serial ATA.

"The 2.5-inch enterprise drive is quite different from a common 2.5-inch notebook drive -- it will have true enterprise reliability and the performance to function in a 24x7 enterprise environment," said Lim.

The enterprise 2.5-inch drives will also have interfaces in all flavours, including the new serial-attached SCSI.

HP has plans to use the new drives in servers designed for tight spaces.

"The density-optimised HP ProLiant DL server line and the direct attached storage systems can be optimised with 2.5-inch enterprise-class drives to enable our customers to receive performance enhancements, without adding more racks or datacentre floor space," said Jeff Jenkins, an acting vice president in HP's server group.


See the Hardware News Section for the latest update on everything from MP3 players and PDAs to supercomputing.

Let the editors know what you think in the Mailroom.

  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendlyPrint with EPSON

Did you find this article useful?
45 out of 92 people found this useful


Full Talkback thread

0 comments

Company/Topic Alerts

Create a new alert from the list below:






Discussions

J.A. Watson J.A. Watson

Copyright in a new light

Thursday 17 December 2009, 8:42 PM

1 comment
lezlow lezlow

POORLY PRIZES

Thursday 17 December 2009, 7:48 PM

1 comment
lezlow lezlow

me to

Thursday 17 December 2009, 7:28 PM

6 comments
lezlow lezlow

no number

Thursday 17 December 2009, 7:25 PM

3 comments
Video icon

Video

Featured Talkback

In association with Network Liberation Movement
When all is said, if Microsoft produce the best product people will buy it and thats a good thing. If people have to buy their product because no one else can produce an alternative, only because interoperability protocols are kept secret, then thats a bad thing.

By: pround

Read full story:
EU court crushes Microsoft's antitrust appeal


Skip Sub Navigation Links to CNET Brand Links

Help

Become part of the ZDNet community.

Newsletters