Advertisement
Promo

Industry watch Toolkit

Students pay for file swapping 'crimes'

John Borland CNET News

Published: 02 May 2003 08:18 BST

  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendly
  • Post Comment

The Recording Industry Association of America (RIAA) sued four students separately last month for running services that searched computers connected to their college networks for MP3 song files. The students also shared copyrighted music from their own machines. The lawsuits marked the first time that the RIAA directly sued students, as opposed to companies, associated with peer-to-peer piracy.

The settlements will see each student making payments to the RIAA totalling between $12,000 and $17,000 (£7,456 and £10,563), split into annual instalments between 2003 and 2006. The lawsuits as filed could have entailed damages (in theory) of up to $100m.

"The record companies indicated right from the beginning that they were amenable to settling this case," said Howard Ende, a Drinker Biddle & Reath attorney who represented defendant Princeton sophomore Daniel Peng. "In my view, this was not about Daniel Peng, per se, but was a utilisation of the legal system to make a point -- essentially to intimidate Internet users."

The lawsuits -- on top of a series of communications that the RIAA and other copyright holders have had with universities over the past year -- have led to a crackdown on campus file swapping and the kind of network search tools created by Peng and the other students.

College officials recently reprimanded a large group of students at Pennsylvania State University for using or operating similar services. This week, the New Jersey Institute of Technology banned the use of file-sharing software on its campus, citing the danger of lawsuits, according to The Chronicle of Higher Education.

Also last month, Naval Academy officials said they had disciplined a group of 85 students who were allegedly caught using campus resources for file sharing.

Despite the settlements, the students did not admit any guilt.

"I don't believe that I did anything wrong," 18-year-old Peng said in a statement. "I am glad that the case has been settled amicably, and I hope that, for the sake of artists, the larger issues can soon be resolved."

In their suits against Peng and the three other students, the RIAA called the services they had created "mini-Napsters." Ende said that Peng, as well as his attorneys, believed that the service he had run was more like Google than Napster, since it had simply searched computers that were hooked up to the campus network, whether or not they contained his software.

As part of their settlements, the students agreed not to knowingly infringe the record label's copyrights while using the Internet. They will also shut down their network search services. Peng's attorneys said he will instead provide links to a record industry Web site.

"We believe it's in everyone's best interest to come to a quick resolution, and that these four defendants now clearly understand the seriousness with which we view this type of illegal behaviour," said RIAA senior vice president Matt Oppenheim in a statement. "We have also sent a clear signal to others that this kind of activity is illegal."

The RIAA said that any future similar enforcement actions could lead to "stiffer settlement obligations".


See the MP3/P2P News Section for the latest on everything from MP3 players to Napster and the other file-swapping services.

Let the editors know what you think in the Mailroom.

  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendlyPrint with EPSON

Did you find this article useful?
73 out of 128 people found this useful


Full Talkback thread

0 comments

Company/Topic Alerts

Create a new alert from the list below:










Discussions

CA CA

Well..

Thursday 17 December 2009, 12:51 AM

2 comments
CA CA

The sooner...

Thursday 17 December 2009, 12:42 AM

1 comment
CA CA

aye..

Thursday 17 December 2009, 12:30 AM

4 comments
CA CA

Mission accomplished..

Wednesday 16 December 2009, 10:09 PM

2 comments
Video icon

Video

Featured Talkback

In association with Network Liberation Movement
When all is said, if Microsoft produce the best product people will buy it and thats a good thing. If people have to buy their product because no one else can produce an alternative, only because interoperability protocols are kept secret, then thats a bad thing.

By: pround

Read full story:
EU court crushes Microsoft's antitrust appeal


Skip Sub Navigation Links to CNET Brand Links

Help

Become part of the ZDNet community.

Newsletters