Advertisement
Promo

Industry watch Toolkit

BT broadband advances rebuffed by government

Graeme Wearden ZDNet.co.uk

Published: 03 Apr 2003 16:14 BST

  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendly
  • Post Comment

The government has reacted coolly to the suggestion that it should work in partnership with BT to drive the rollout of broadband across the UK.

On Thursday, Ben Verwaayen, BT's chief executive, said he was keen for BT's rollout of ADSL to be more closely linked with the government's drive to broadband-enable the public sector.

Verwaayen explained that if ADSL was used to bring broadband to public sector organisations across the UK it would help to lower the cost of upgrading local exchanges and speed up the rollout of high-speed Internet services in remote and rural areas.

"Broadband coverage is a key issue for the government," Verwaayen told journalists. "If every hospital and GP's surgery were in an enabled situation, it would be a great help in getting our trigger levels down."

Verwaayen added that although the government has committed some £30m to stimulate the UK's broadband market, only £1m had been spent on infrastructure with the lion's share going on encouraging demand. BT is keen for the government to give more of a boost to the physical rollout of broadband networks.

"We've presented the government with five models, showing how they can help broadband rollout in rural areas," explained Verwaayen.

The prime minister, Tony Blair, announced last November that £1bn would be spent over the next few years to give every school, hospital and GP's surgery a broadband connection.

Precise details as to how this commitment will be delivered are not yet available -- to the concern of MPs such as Sir George Young -- but the government does not seem keen to leap into bed with BT by linking its plan closely to ADSL rollout.

A Department of Trade and Industry spokeswoman confirmed that e-commerce minister Stephen Timms had been shown five scenarios of future broadband coverage by BT, but explained that the government's strategy on this issue is both technology-neutral and company-neutral.

"We're interested in listening to what all the operators have to say, but our aim is to deliver the right kind of broadband in every region, so that people have access to the technology that's most suitable to them," the spokeswoman told ZDNet UK.

As Timms told parliament last week, competition is a key part of the government's broadband strategy. Although BT has the vast majority of the wholesale ADSL market, there is a flourishing retail sector with over 100 ISPs reselling its products, while NTL and Telewest collectively have more broadband customers than BT.

Insiders suggest it is unlikely that the government would want to endanger its competition credentials by throwing its lot in with BT.

On Thursday, BT also announced substantial cuts in the price of its business broadband packages, and a smaller reduction in the cost of consumer ADSL. Several ISPs have welcomed this move and cut their own prices in response, but others have been less impressed.

One BT rival, network operator Thus, has already asked Oftel to investigate these changes, claiming that they are anti-competitive.


See the Broadband News Section for the latest on cable modems, ADSL, satellite and other high-speed access technologies, including a comprehensive guide to the best deals out there.

Let the editors know what you think in the Mailroom.

  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendlyPrint with EPSON

Did you find this article useful?
16 out of 62 people found this useful


Full Talkback thread

0 comments

Company/Topic Alerts

Create a new alert from the list below:









Discussions

Fat Pop Do Wop Fat Pop Do Wop

How far will it all go?

Sunday 29 November 2009, 12:04 AM

3 comments
siarad siarad

Maybe, similarly,

Saturday 28 November 2009, 8:42 AM

3 comments
smpcs smpcs

Does 10x faster development dumb down...

Saturday 28 November 2009, 7:31 AM

28 comments
Video icon

Video

Featured Talkback

In association with Network Liberation Movement
When all is said, if Microsoft produce the best product people will buy it and thats a good thing. If people have to buy their product because no one else can produce an alternative, only because interoperability protocols are kept secret, then thats a bad thing.

By: pround

Read full story:
EU court crushes Microsoft's antitrust appeal


Skip Sub Navigation Links to CNET Brand Links

Help

Become part of the ZDNet community.

Newsletters