Advertisement
Promo

Industry watch Toolkit

Streaming media group closes in on MPEG-4 copy protection

Paul Festa CNET News.com CNET News

Published: 01 Apr 2003 07:39 BST

  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendly
  • Post Comment

Aiming to close a long-standing gap in digital rights management for MPEG-4, a streaming media consortium is seeking comments on an encryption specification scheduled for release in June.

The Internet Streaming Media Alliance (ISMA), whose members include Apple Computer, AOL Time Warner, Cisco Systems, IBM and Sun Microsystems, said it would spend the next two months evaluating public review of the new digital rights management (DRM) specification.

The proposed specification is a way of encrypting streaming media files that would be compatible with existing methods for key encryption and DRM. That would give content providers more flexibility in pursuing their commercial goals, the ISMA said.

"In developing this specification, we spent a significant amount of time gathering feedback from major content owners," ISMA President Tom Jacobs said in a statement. "As a result, our specification does not bind them to utilise specific rights and key management systems or preselected solution vendors. This allows content owners to retain control over critical business processes and related decisions."

MPEG-4, a standard for compressing audio and video files for delivery over the Internet and other networks, is the work of the Moving Picture Experts Group, which also designed MPEG-2 for digital television and MP3 for music files.

ISMA compared its DRM specification to secure sockets layer (SSL) and HTTPS, specifications that provide security for documents sent over the Web.

The new DRM specification builds on ISMA's own 1.0 specification and on the National Institute of Standards & Technology's (NIST) 128-megabit AES encryption standard. ISMA said that meant it was free of intellectual property constraints.

One industry expert said ISMA's work would advance DRM technology for streaming media, but only incrementally.

"I see it as another step toward more interoperability in DRM," said Rob Koenen, president of the MPEG-4 Industry Forum. "But that's a difficult problem to solve. There are many little steps to be taken on the road to more interoperable DRM and agreeing on encryption is only one of them."

More thorny issues that awaited resolution included the establishment of a standard way of evaluating and managing "trust", or the degree to which a certain player or device that is downloading media is considered secure. That will require some kind of entity that certifies players and devices after a high degree of technical analysis, Koenen said.

Ongoing work under the MPEG 21 banner is addressing some of these problems, including the establishment of an XML-based language for DRM rules.

The ISMA invited "technical members of the security or content protection community" to apply for a review copy of the specification on the consortium's Web site.


See the Digital Rights News Section for the latest on copy protection, piracy, DVD recording and zoning.

Let the editors know what you think in the Mailroom.

  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendlyPrint with EPSON

Did you find this article useful?
33 out of 72 people found this useful


Full Talkback thread

1 comment

  1. I want to check this mpeg 4 encoding and decoding... Manish Mehta

Company/Topic Alerts

Create a new alert from the list below:






Discussions

1000266930 1000266930

Typical dictatorial attitude from the...

Wednesday 2 December 2009, 12:22 PM

2 comments
ator1940 ator1940

ACTA

Wednesday 2 December 2009, 12:07 PM

2 comments
hkommedal hkommedal

It certainly does.

Wednesday 2 December 2009, 12:15 AM

5 comments
CA CA

No, Mr Filesharer, I expect you to die...

Tuesday 1 December 2009, 10:20 PM

4 comments
Video icon

Video

Featured Talkback

In association with Network Liberation Movement
When all is said, if Microsoft produce the best product people will buy it and thats a good thing. If people have to buy their product because no one else can produce an alternative, only because interoperability protocols are kept secret, then thats a bad thing.

By: pround

Read full story:
EU court crushes Microsoft's antitrust appeal


Skip Sub Navigation Links to CNET Brand Links

Help

Become part of the ZDNet community.

Newsletters