Advertisement
Promo

Industry watch Toolkit

XML standard approved after three years

Paul Festa CNET News.com GameSpot Europe

Published: 26 Mar 2003 11:52 GMT

  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendly
  • Post Comment

A method of labelling discrete parts of an XML document concluded its tortuous journey toward standardisation with the World Wide Web Consortium's approval of XPointer.

The World Wide Web Consortium (W3C) on Tuesday issued XPointer in three instalments: XPointer Framework, XPointer element Scheme, and XPointer xmlns Scheme.

Extensible Markup Language (XML) is a W3C recommendation that lets authors create their own task or industry-specific markup language for more flexible and searchable digital documents.

While XML has long had a linking mechanism built in, the trio of XPointer recommendations provides a way for anyone to segment an XML document and label and link to it.

The Framework gives authors a model for identifying parts of an XML document. The element recommendation lets authors "point" to those specific parts, and the xmlns, or namespace, recommendation establishes a means of delineating which tags belong to which XPointer schemes so that browsers can distinguish between same-named tags from different schemes.

XPointer has been in the works at the W3C for years. Its original version became a candidate recommendation -- the consortium's penultimate phase of approval, which usually lasts a matter of weeks -- in July 2000.

That early XPointer specification was based on the W3C's XPath recommendation.

Calling the initial work "challenging to implement," the W3C went back to the drawing board and came up with the latest version, which consortium representative Janet Daly described as "leaner, simpler...and more easily implemented."


See the Software News Section for the latest headlines on everything from peer to peer clients to Office software and beyond.

Let the editors know what you think in the Mailroom.

  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendlyPrint with EPSON

Did you find this article useful?
75 out of 156 people found this useful


Full Talkback thread

0 comments

Company/Topic Alerts

Create a new alert from the list below:












Discussions

Xwindowsjunkie Xwindowsjunkie

SiO2 is cheaper than Cu

Friday 18 December 2009, 8:00 AM

4 comments
CA CA

Copyright in a new light

Friday 18 December 2009, 3:54 AM

2 comments
CA CA

Inventions and Product Design

Friday 18 December 2009, 3:35 AM

1 comment
CA CA

I'm surprised...

Friday 18 December 2009, 2:13 AM

1 comment
Video icon

Video

Featured Talkback

In association with Network Liberation Movement
When all is said, if Microsoft produce the best product people will buy it and thats a good thing. If people have to buy their product because no one else can produce an alternative, only because interoperability protocols are kept secret, then thats a bad thing.

By: pround

Read full story:
EU court crushes Microsoft's antitrust appeal


Skip Sub Navigation Links to CNET Brand Links

Help

Become part of the ZDNet community.

Newsletters