Advertisement
Promo

Industry watch Toolkit

IBM expanding further into Intel's server market

Stephen Shankland, CNET News.com CNET News

Published: 14 Mar 2003 09:48 GMT

  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendly
  • Post Comment

In its attempt to conquer the Intel server market, IBM is working on two new systems that will expand the boundaries of Big Blue's product line.

One system, the 32-processor x445 coming later this year, is based on a second version of IBM's EXA chip, said Tom Bradicich, chief technology officer of IBM's xSeries Intel server line. At the other extreme of the product line will be a single-processor "blade" server, he said in a Tuesday interview.

The new systems are part of IBM's striving to shift from being largely irrelevant in the $16bn (£10bn) Intel server market to becoming a leading advocate that applies its own considerable server-technology expertise. IBM now is third in the Intel server market behind Hewlett-Packard and Dell.

Some, including Merrill Lynch analyst Steve Milunovich, say Big Blue's effort is beginning to pay off. "IBM now makes money in Intel servers," Milunovich said in a Tuesday report.

Intel servers are increasingly important for IBM. They're the most common foundation for Linux, the Unix-like operating system IBM has wholeheartedly embraced, and Gartner Group expects more revenue from sales of Intel servers than from Unix servers, which for years have been the largest segment of the market.

The current EXA chipset is the foundation of the current x440 system that accommodates as many as 16 Intel Xeon processors and of an Itanium version that IBM Web sites refer to as the x450.

Big Blue will begin selling the Itanium product within one or two months, said Susan Whitney, general manager of IBM's Intel server group, in an interview. "We'll have IA-64 (Itanium) capability in the next 30 to 60 days," she said.

The EXA chipset shuttles data between a computer's processors, memory banks and input-output systems. The second-generation EXA chips have "directory tables" embedded into the silicon that speed up transfers of data from one part of the system to the other, making it possible to join more of the four-processor modules, Bradicich said.

IBM was the second-ranked seller of higher-end Intel servers with four or eight processors in the fourth quarter of 2002, according to IDC. No. 1 HP sold $484m worth of the systems versus IBM's $377m.

IBM's high-end servers haven't been able to live up to their full potential because Windows and Linux don't currently work well on servers such as the x440, x445 and x450, whose designs make for varying response times when a processor needs to retrieve information from memory.

IBM has customers running a single instance of Windows on eight-processor servers today, but Windows Server 2003, coming April 24, will mean the operating system will be able to work well on 16-processor machines as well, Whitney said.

The increasing sophistication of Intel servers plays to IBM's technical strengths, and the company is gleeful about the growing maturity.

"In 1998, a PC server was a PC (turned) on its side. Today, we have 16-way SMP (symmetrical multiprocessing) systems, with virtualised partitions and robust system management tools at one end and highly dense, integrated blades at the other end," Whitney said.

Blade servers are smaller systems that slide side by side into a single chassis, sharing components such as network connections and power supplies. Where Hewlett-Packard, Compaq and Sun Microsystems began their blade lines with lower-end uniprocessor systems, IBM entered the blade fray with more powerful dual-processor and, next, four-processor models.

IBM still is planning more powerful blades, though. In the second half of 2003, Big Blue will release blades with four Xeon chips and blades with two PowerPC 970 chips, IBM executives have said.


See Chips Central for the latest headlines on processors and semiconductors.

To find out more about the computers and hardware that these chips are being used in, see ZDNet UK's Hardware News Section.

Let the Chips Central editor know what you think by email. And sign up for the weekly Chips Central newsletter.

  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendlyPrint with EPSON

Did you find this article useful?
39 out of 91 people found this useful


Full Talkback thread

0 comments

Company/Topic Alerts

Create a new alert from the list below:










Discussions

Tezzer Tezzer

Here we go again :(

Sunday 15 November 2009, 5:32 PM

6 comments
Tezzer Tezzer

Karmic Koala Krashes

Sunday 15 November 2009, 5:21 PM

2 comments
J.A. Watson J.A. Watson

Karmic Koala Krashes

Sunday 15 November 2009, 5:11 PM

2 comments
lezlow lezlow

i agree

Sunday 15 November 2009, 3:13 PM

15 comments
Video icon

Video

Featured Talkback

In association with Network Liberation Movement
When all is said, if Microsoft produce the best product people will buy it and thats a good thing. If people have to buy their product because no one else can produce an alternative, only because interoperability protocols are kept secret, then thats a bad thing.

By: pround

Read full story:
EU court crushes Microsoft's antitrust appeal


Skip Sub Navigation Links to CNET Brand Links

Help

Become part of the ZDNet community.

Newsletters