Advertisement
Promo

Industry watch Toolkit

Oracle plugs six database holes

Published: 19 Feb 2003 08:41 GMT

  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendly
  • Post Comment

Next-Generation Security Software, the British security firm that discovered the bug that allowed the Slammer worm to proliferate last month, has discovered six flaws in Oracle's newest database product.

Redwood Shores, California-based Oracle released patches for the six vulnerabilities -- four deemed critical and two merely serious -- last week.

Oracle has tried to structure the way it releases patches for its products, so that customers aren't inundated with fixes, said Mary-Ann Davidson, the company's chief security officer.

"I always worry about whether people apply the patches," she said. "We did revise our bug handling, so we have a formula for what is big and nasty. If it's above a certain severity threshold, we can release the fix as a one-off, before we release an (entire) patch set."

The formula includes factors such as how widely used the impacted software is and what effects exploiting the flaw can have.

The current flaws include four critical buffer overflows in various components of Oracle's database server software, including its latest Oracle 9i Release 2. Buffer overflows, or overruns, occur when an application does not handle memory correctly. By causing a buffer overflow, attackers can insert their own code into the execution of the application. Each of the four flaws could allow a malicious user -- someone who already has some access to the database -- to gain complete control of the server.

Two other vulnerabilities could use other Oracle components to cause a denial-of-service attack.

Davidson said that six flaws, in five advisories, may sound a daunting number but that Oracle decided that separating the alerts made more sense than releasing a single combined notification, a strategy occasionally used by Microsoft.

"We aren't going to play that game," she said. "We could have bundled all of these into one alert, but we thought that would have been confusing to people."


For all security-related news, including updates on the latest viruses, hacking exploits and patches, check out ZDNet UK's Security News Section.

Let the editors know what you think in the Mailroom.

  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendlyPrint with EPSON

Did you find this article useful?
52 out of 91 people found this useful


Full Talkback thread

0 comments

Company/Topic Alerts

Create a new alert from the list below:





Discussions

lezlow lezlow

hillier or hitler

Tuesday 17 November 2009, 12:15 AM

2 comments
lezlow lezlow

id this

Tuesday 17 November 2009, 12:05 AM

2 comments
lezlow lezlow

spam

Tuesday 17 November 2009, 12:04 AM

5 comments
lezlow lezlow

homer

Tuesday 17 November 2009, 12:02 AM

2 comments
Video icon

Video

Featured Talkback

In association with Network Liberation Movement
When all is said, if Microsoft produce the best product people will buy it and thats a good thing. If people have to buy their product because no one else can produce an alternative, only because interoperability protocols are kept secret, then thats a bad thing.

By: pround

Read full story:
EU court crushes Microsoft's antitrust appeal


Skip Sub Navigation Links to CNET Brand Links

Help

Become part of the ZDNet community.

Newsletters