Advertisement
Promo

Industry watch Toolkit

NHS patient data 'insecure', says group

Matthew Broersma ZDNet.co.uk

Published: 05 Feb 2003 11:44 GMT

  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendly
  • Post Comment

An information policy think tank has called for the NHS to improve its safeguards on patient privacy, charging that the current system allows thousands of unauthorised people to gain access to patient information every year.

The Foundation for Information Policy Research (FIPR), a non-profit group, argued that the NHS' patient-data strategy is fundamentally flawed, and is likely to leave personal information increasingly insecure. "Patients entrust some of their most sensitive personal information to their doctors. NHS managers should not be trying to undermine that trust by spreading identifiable patient data around the health service bureaucracy and the civil service," said FIPR chairman Ross Anderson on Wednesday in a statement.

The organisation was responding to NHS plans to create a central electronic patient record consolidating the currently existing databases that record payments for hospital treatment, names, addresses and other medical data, and making the information available to NHS administrators and civil servants.

Last month the NHS announced an injection of £3bn of government cash for IT systems, which would enable it to centralise its data sources. The centralisation is partly an effort to combat fraud, as it will enable investigators to more easily detect patterns across all NHS records.

FIPR argued that such a database is likely to lead to growing abuse, citing an anti-fraud trial in one health authority that exposed 30 unauthorised information requests per week. "This suggests that over 200,000 attempts are made every year to get health information on patients, by investigators who call up pretending to be doctors or administrators. Most of these attempts currently succeed," the group said.

The group called for the NHS to abandon its centralised database plans in favour of more stringent authentication of information requests, a better system of patient consent to sharing of their information, and the removal of patient names from hospital invoices.


Who's watching you? Get the latest on spy networks such as Echelon and Carnivore, as well as privacy issues for companies and individuals alike, at ZDNet UK's Privacy News Section.

Let the editors know what you think in the Mailroom.

  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendlyPrint with EPSON

Did you find this article useful?
69 out of 132 people found this useful


Full Talkback thread

0 comments

Company/Topic Alerts

Create a new alert from the list below:






Discussions

Tezzer Tezzer

The only surprise...

Wednesday 16 December 2009, 1:47 PM

3 comments
ator1940 ator1940

Cloud apps

Wednesday 16 December 2009, 1:33 PM

1 comment
ator1940 ator1940

MS copy?

Wednesday 16 December 2009, 1:25 PM

3 comments
J.A. Watson J.A. Watson

Big Surprise... NOT!

Wednesday 16 December 2009, 12:05 PM

3 comments
Video icon

Video

Featured Talkback

In association with Network Liberation Movement
When all is said, if Microsoft produce the best product people will buy it and thats a good thing. If people have to buy their product because no one else can produce an alternative, only because interoperability protocols are kept secret, then thats a bad thing.

By: pround

Read full story:
EU court crushes Microsoft's antitrust appeal


Skip Sub Navigation Links to CNET Brand Links

Help

Become part of the ZDNet community.

Newsletters