Advertisement
Promo

Industry watch Toolkit

Group aims to strengthen Web services

Martin LaMonica CNET News

Published: 09 Jan 2003 09:26 GMT

  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendly
  • Post Comment

A group of information technology companies published a specification on Thursday designed to improve the reliability of business applications that use Web services.

WS-Reliability, if accepted as a standard and adopted by Web services providers, will let a company ensure that a message sent between two different applications is delivered reliably. For example, a company could send a purchase order to a supplier via a Web service and be guaranteed that the message was either successfully delivered and performed its function, or that the transmission failed.

Currently, businesses working with Web services can make sure their communications are reliable using specialised software or other established products. WS-Reliability seeks to create a standardised method that is widely supported.

The specification, which will be submitted to a standards body in a few weeks, was written by a number of companies, including Fujitsu, Hitachi, NEC, Oracle, Sun Microsystems and Sonic Software.

WS-Reliability builds on top of the Simple Object Access Protocol (SOAP), one of the fundamental Web services protocols that defines how XML (Extensible Markup Language) documents are transported over a network. Layering WS-Reliability on top of SOAP gives businesses that deploy Web services the flexibility to use different network transport protocols, representatives from the authoring companies said.

The contributors said that reliable messaging is a key piece in making Web services industrial strength, particularly for asynchronous communications between different parties. Traditionally, business applications rely on a request/response form of communication, which demands that different applications synchronize using the same underlying protocols and development models.

The "loosely coupled" model that Web services facilitates is better suited to multistep business processes where an XML document moves from one step in the business workflow to the next, company representatives said.

For more long-running, asynchronous, document-oriented business processes, "you need assurances that when there are multiple messages, you can manage the quality of service," said Tom Rutt, a consulting engineer with Fujitsu.

Ron Schmelzer, an analyst at ZapThink, said WS-Reliability tackles one of the long-standing hurdles to Web services adoption, which also include security, management and transactions.

"The big problem with the way people are implementing Web services today is that they are using pretty brittle protocols like HTTP (hypertext transport protocol). It's OK for your browser, but no one in their right mind is going to implement a travel reservation booking system with that," said Schmelzer. "The application had better succeed or reliably fail. It shouldn't be that the server didn't respond."


What standards will drive the next wave of Web-based services, and how will they interact? Check out the latest developments on .Net, Java, Liberty Alliance, Passport and other technologies at ZDNet UK's Web Services News Section, including analysis, case studies and management issues.

Let the editors know what you think in the Mailroom.

  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendlyPrint with EPSON

Did you find this article useful?
68 out of 128 people found this useful


Full Talkback thread

0 comments

Company/Topic Alerts

Create a new alert from the list below:





Discussions

roger andre roger andre

Murdoch versus the Net? Game on.

Friday 13 November 2009, 12:06 AM

11 comments
CA CA

Murdoch versus the Net? Game on.

Thursday 12 November 2009, 11:54 PM

11 comments
CA CA

Novell’s Mono Tools tunes up for stere...

Thursday 12 November 2009, 11:27 PM

1 comment
CA CA

We'll see eh...

Thursday 12 November 2009, 11:20 PM

1 comment
Video icon

Video

Featured Talkback

In association with Network Liberation Movement
When all is said, if Microsoft produce the best product people will buy it and thats a good thing. If people have to buy their product because no one else can produce an alternative, only because interoperability protocols are kept secret, then thats a bad thing.

By: pround

Read full story:
EU court crushes Microsoft's antitrust appeal


Skip Sub Navigation Links to CNET Brand Links

Help

Become part of the ZDNet community.

Newsletters