Advertisement
Promo

Industry watch Toolkit

Smutty banker awarded compensation

Will Sturgeon silicon.com

Published: 12 Dec 2002 16:28 GMT

  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendly
  • Post Comment

A UK banker who was sacked by Lehman Brothers for sending pornographic emails has won a case for unfair dismissal after accusing his former employers of double standards given they had previously entertained staff at a party with female strippers.

Bruce Sangster, 49, had a £57,000 per year job at Lehman Brothers before he was caught emailing smutty photographs to friends, at which point he was sacked for gross misconduct.

While the tribunal agreed with this assessment of Sangster's actions, it also stated that he had not been properly informed about the email policy within the bank, and as such his sacking was unfounded.

The ruling said that staff within the bank had probably been "lulled into a false sense that inappropriate behaviour of the kind that he indulged in might be tolerated". This comment referred to Sangster's accusation of double standards at Lehman Brothers where he claimed staff were treated to strip shows on two different occasions at company parties.

Sangster now stands to receive a compensation payment of several thousands of pounds - though the tribunal said it would have been more if his sacking had been less deserved. It stressed in its ruling that despite the legal victory Sangster was still largely the architect of his own downfall.

As such he will only receive 25 per cent of all compensation payments due to him.

Lehman Brothers is considering an appeal against the ruling.


Who's watching you? Get the latest on spy networks such as Echelon and Carnivore, as well as privacy issues for companies and individuals alike, at ZDNet UK's Privacy News Section.

Have your say instantly, and see what others have said. Go to the ZDNet news forum.

Let the editors know what you think in the Mailroom.

  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendlyPrint with EPSON

Did you find this article useful?
60 out of 109 people found this useful


Full Talkback thread

0 comments

Company/Topic Alerts

Create a new alert from the list below:









Discussions

CA CA

Copyright in a new light

Friday 18 December 2009, 3:54 AM

2 comments
CA CA

Inventions and Product Design

Friday 18 December 2009, 3:35 AM

1 comment
CA CA

I'm surprised...

Friday 18 December 2009, 2:13 AM

1 comment
Video icon

Video

Featured Talkback

In association with Network Liberation Movement
When all is said, if Microsoft produce the best product people will buy it and thats a good thing. If people have to buy their product because no one else can produce an alternative, only because interoperability protocols are kept secret, then thats a bad thing.

By: pround

Read full story:
EU court crushes Microsoft's antitrust appeal


Skip Sub Navigation Links to CNET Brand Links

Help

Become part of the ZDNet community.

Newsletters