ZDNet UK


Skip to Main Content

ZDNet.co.uk - Winner of Best Business Website 2007
  1. Home
  2. News
  3. Blogs
  4. Reviews
  5. Prices
  6. Resources
  7. Community
  8. My ZDNet

 

ZDNet UK RSS Feeds


IT Jobs

Industry watch Toolkit

Adobe: Few eBook copies found

Lisa M Bowman CNet

Published: 05 Dec 2002 12:27 GMT

  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendly
  • Post Comment

An Adobe Systems employee on Wednesday during testimony in a federal copyright trial acknowledged his company hadn't tracked down any unauthorised eBooks created by ElcomSoft software.

ElcomSoft, a software company based in Russia, is charged with five counts of offering and marketing software designed to crack Adobe's eBooks, actions prosecutors say violate digital copyright laws.

In a federal courtroom in the US, ElcomSoft attorney Joseph Burton asked Thomas Diaz, a senior engineering manager at Adobe, whether his company tried to determine if there were illegal copies of eBooks, electronic versions of printed books, in circulation as a result of ElcomSoft's actions.

Diaz said Adobe had hired two companies to conduct surveillance and search for unauthorised eBooks on the Internet. Burton then asked whether Adobe "found any indication that Elcomsoft's product was used to make illicit copies of books?"

"Not to my knowledge," Diaz replied.

The case is the first major trial to deal with the criminal provisions of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act, or DMCA. The law makes it illegal to circumvent copyright protections, even if code is being cracked for legal uses, such as reverse engineering.

While cross-examining several government witnesses, including three current and former Adobe employees, Burton tried to make the case that companies are trying to use technological controls to quash a consumer's ability to perform tasks within his or her legal right -- such as making a back-up copy of a document, for example.

Prosecutors are trying to show that ElcomSoft intended to offer a product that would let people make numerous unauthorised copies of eBooks -- essentially breaking copyright laws.

During Wednesday's proceedings, US attorney Scott Frewing attempted to show that Adobe and other companies aren't trying to place undue restrictions on intellectual property. He pointed out that there are certain legal restrictions for the copying of printed books as well.

At one point during questioning, Frewing asked Adobe's Diaz about bringing a printed book to the beach. If an unexpected wave got the book wet, ruining it, "could I go to the bookstore and demand another copy?" Frewing asked.

"You can demand," Diaz replied, adding that he wasn't sure such a request would be necessarily successful.

The government could wrap up its testimony as early as Thursday.

It's also looking unlikely that Russian programmer Dmitry Sklyarov will testify for the government. Sklyarov, an ElcomSoft employee, was arrested and jailed in Las Vegas last year after giving a speech about the company's software. Prosecutors, however, dropped charges against him in exchange for his testimony in the case.

Prosecutors hinted that they plan to question other witnesses about an earlier deposition given by Sklyarov and possibly show a videotape to the court. The defence team said they plan to call Sklyarov if the government does not.


See the Software News Section for the latest headlines on everything from peer to peer clients to Office software and beyond.

Have your say instantly, and see what others have said. Go to the ZDNet news forum.

Let the editors know what you think in the Mailroom.

  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendly Print with Kyocera

Did you find this article useful?
53 out of 119 people found this useful


Full Talkback thread

0 comments

Company/Topic Alerts

Create a new alert from the list below:





Discussions

0xyGen 0xyGen

Please help me in choosing web hosting

Sunday 20 July 2008, 10:32 AM

1 post
1000030281 1000030281

Facebook Bans Firefox 3

Sunday 20 July 2008, 2:33 AM

1 comment

Featured Talkback

When all is said, if Microsoft produce the best product people will buy it and thats a good thing. If people have to buy their product because no one else can produce an alternative, only because interoperability protocols are kept secret, then thats a bad thing.

By: pround

Read full story:
EU court crushes Microsoft's antitrust appeal