Advertisement
Promo

Industry watch Toolkit

Dell slings its 'blade' server line

John G. Spooner CNet

Published: 25 Nov 2002 16:08 GMT

  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendly
  • Post Comment

Dell on Monday unsheathed its first "blade" server in a bid to carve out more market share.

As expected, the new PowerEdge 1655MC server -- a relatively slender modular machine designed fit into a rack with others of its kind -- features dual Pentium III processors from Intel. Originally scheduled for introduction in the third quarter, it ran into a modest delay and comes to market later than blades from other hardware makers such as Hewlett-Packard.

The Dell blade server is part of a larger effort by the company to expand into areas beyond the PC. Though the company has reached the No. 1 spot in industry-standard servers, machines that are based on Intel hardware and the Windows or Linux operating systems -- and though it continues to grow its market share in that area and in the overall PC market -- Dell wants to continue expanding into higher-margin markets.

Blade servers fit that bill. The company could sell a larger number of servers using the blade approach and also package them with a range of its new services, such as doing the job of migrating companies' computer networks to blades from large numbers of standalone servers. Dell can also combine the servers with its storage products and services.

Blades as a category of server were designed to be cheaper to own and maintain - -a major selling point in the down economy. That is because they take up less space than standalone servers, offer neater cabling and can be managed from a central console, making them easier and less time-consuming for company IT staff to administer.

Dell's servers are expected to be a little larger than some competing products, but the company argues that its machines are more powerful, less costly and easier to manage in that they use the same power supplies and network gear as its other servers.

Still, the new product isn't for every company, with the benefits accruing to those who plan to buy large number of servers.

"It's at three (blades) you'll have a cost savings crossing over to the new architecture," a company representative said. "Our strategy was to immediately provide (customers) a cost benefit they'd be able to use by taking advantage of shared components."

The new PowerEdge 1655MC product line allows a single rack to hold 84 servers, each equipped with up to two 1.26GHz Intel Pentium III processors and two hard drives with capacities up to 73GB each. Six servers fit in each enclosure, and 14 of the enclosures fit in a single rack.

The individual blade servers will start at $1,499 (about £970) each and include a single 1.26GHz Pentium III and an 18GB hard drive. However, they must be purchased with an enclosure, which costs $1,799, bringing the price for a single server plus the enclosure to $3,298. A fully populated enclosure, which includes six servers, starts at $10,973.


See the Hardware News Section for the latest update on everything from MP3 players and PDAs to supercomputing.

Have your say instantly, and see what others have said. Go to the ZDNet news forum.

Let the editors know what you think in the Mailroom.

  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendlyPrint with EPSON

Did you find this article useful?
46 out of 100 people found this useful


Full Talkback thread

0 comments

Company/Topic Alerts

Create a new alert from the list below:





Discussions

J.A. Watson J.A. Watson

Copyright in a new light

Thursday 17 December 2009, 8:42 PM

1 comment
lezlow lezlow

POORLY PRIZES

Thursday 17 December 2009, 7:48 PM

1 comment
lezlow lezlow

me to

Thursday 17 December 2009, 7:28 PM

6 comments
lezlow lezlow

no number

Thursday 17 December 2009, 7:25 PM

3 comments
Video icon

Video

Featured Talkback

In association with Network Liberation Movement
When all is said, if Microsoft produce the best product people will buy it and thats a good thing. If people have to buy their product because no one else can produce an alternative, only because interoperability protocols are kept secret, then thats a bad thing.

By: pround

Read full story:
EU court crushes Microsoft's antitrust appeal


Skip Sub Navigation Links to CNET Brand Links

Help

Become part of the ZDNet community.

Newsletters