Advertisement
Promo

Industry watch Toolkit

IT departments left out of outsourcing decisions

Graham Hayday Silicon.com

Published: 08 Nov 2002 17:05 GMT

  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendly
  • Post Comment

Most companies view outsourcing as a good way of cutting costs and don't ask for input from the IT department when making such decisions, according to research released this week by Unisys.

The company found that two thirds of the financial directors and chief executives surveyed believe the finance division is far more influential than the IT department when it comes to decisions about outsourcing.

The research also shows that the finance division views outsourcing almost entirely as a means to cut costs, which Unisys believes exposes projects to potential failure from the word go.

This view often prevails because IT directors do not have input at the highest management level: fewer than half of the cheif executives had a place on the board, with the IT function usually being represented by finance.

Paul Bevan, business development director, Unisys UK, said: "If companies simply view outsourcing as a cost cutting exercise then they actually risk weakening their business. The benefit of outsourcing is the access it provides to the technologies, people and methodologies that a business could not develop or sustain on its own. If IT is not involved in the decision making process the broader view is frequently lost."

Bevan also believes that far from taking power - and possibly even jobs -- away from the IT department, outsourcing can improve its standing within companies. He added: "When organisations come to measure what IT delivers for the business, it must be in terms of the value it adds rather than on a cost saving basis -- and this must also include IT outsourcing projects.

"This is one core area of business in which IT and finance need to start talking the same language if they are to really reap the benefits that outsourcing can provide. Organisations need to view it as an efficient way of support and enhancing the business -- not just a way to save money."


For a round-up of the latest tech business coverage, see the Business News Section.

Have your say instantly, and see what others have said. Go to the ZDNet news forum.

Let the editors know what you think in the Mailroom.

  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendlyPrint with EPSON

Did you find this article useful?
50 out of 108 people found this useful


Full Talkback thread

0 comments

Company/Topic Alerts

Create a new alert from the list below:



Discussions

kavurt kavurt

Taking Out the Skype Garbage

Sunday 15 November 2009, 8:45 PM

7 comments
Xwindowsjunkie Xwindowsjunkie

Karmic Koala Krashes

Sunday 15 November 2009, 7:13 PM

3 comments
Tezzer Tezzer

Here we go again :(

Sunday 15 November 2009, 5:32 PM

6 comments
Tezzer Tezzer

Karmic Koala Krashes

Sunday 15 November 2009, 5:21 PM

3 comments
Video icon

Video

Featured Talkback

In association with Network Liberation Movement
When all is said, if Microsoft produce the best product people will buy it and thats a good thing. If people have to buy their product because no one else can produce an alternative, only because interoperability protocols are kept secret, then thats a bad thing.

By: pround

Read full story:
EU court crushes Microsoft's antitrust appeal


Skip Sub Navigation Links to CNET Brand Links

Help

Become part of the ZDNet community.

Newsletters