ZDNet UK


Skip to Main Content

ZDNet.co.uk - Winner of Best Business Website 2007
  1. Home
  2. News
  3. Blogs
  4. Reviews
  5. Prices
  6. Resources
  7. Community
  8. My ZDNet

 

ZDNet UK RSS Feeds


IT Jobs

Industry watch Toolkit

Anti-spam lists bar Yahoo! stores

Troy Wolverton CNet

Published: 13 Sep 2002 09:18 BST

  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendly
  • Post Comment

Yahoo!'s storefronts site has made its way onto two more lists of suspected junk emailers.

London-based Spamhaus, which runs a spam-blocking service, added Yahoo!'s stores site to its list of suspected spammers on Wednesday, some two weeks after the Mail Abuse Prevention System (MAPS) took a similar step. Although Spamhaus removed the stores site on Thursday after talking with the company, the site is still included on another blocking list run by Spews.org.

Spamhaus took the Yahoo! site off its list after hearing from the Web portal that it plans to have a new team in place next week to respond to spam complaints, said Steve Linford, director of the Spamhaus Project.

"Thousands of people were complaining. They just weren't being acted on," Linford said. "They didn't have sufficient staff to deal with them. These complaints were just piling up."

Yahoo! was removed from the Spamhaus list after the company worked with the anti-spam group to resolve the issue, company spokeswoman Linda Pederson said in a statement. "Yahoo! Store's license agreement explicitly forbids spamming. We take this matter very seriously," Pederson said.

Pederson did not return calls seeking comment about the company's listing on the Spews.org site and about what specific steps Yahoo! took to have its storefronts site removed from Spamhaus' list.

Inundated by email, many companies and organisations have begun to take drastic steps to stem the flow. Many have turned to block-listing companies, which research spam complaints and list the IP (Internet Protocol) addresses of suspected spammers. Companies who subscribe to the block lists then have the option of restricting access to those IP addresses.

That's what happened last month when MAPS, a popular anti-spam group, added Yahoo!'s stores to its list of suspected spammers. The action came after Yahoo! allegedly didn't respond to repeated notices about a suspected junk e-mail that had been circulating since February and that pointed to a storefront hosted by Yahoo! MAPS later removed Yahoo! from its block list after the Web portal contacted it.

Some critics of block lists have charged that these methods are unsophisticated, because they tend to restrict access not only to suspected spammers, but also to innocent sites that happen to share the same or similar IP addresses.

Spamhaus, for instance, added Yahoo!'s stores site to its block list in response to an alleged spam pointing to a Web site called GoInk4Less.com, which is hosted by Yahoo!, said Spamhaus' Linford. But GoInk4Less is just one among thousands of storefronts hosted by Yahoo!, many of which presumably never sent spam.

GoInk4Less did not respond to requests for comment.

But many other Yahoo! stores were sending spam, Linford said. Because spam complaints seemed to be falling on deaf ears at Yahoo!, the company was becoming known as a haven for spammers, he said.

"They were allowing spammers to host their sites on Yahoo! stores," Linford said. "It was very significantly attracting other spammers to Yahoo! stores. That's something that no other European or North American provider does, and it's something that Yahoo! stores shouldn't have allowed either."

A posting on Spews.org cited similar reasons why the Yahoo! stores site is still on Spews.org's block list.

"Complaint volume way up, site termination volume way, WAY, down," the post said. "Hosting at Yahoo! is a dirty little secret more spammers are discovering."

Spews.org representatives did not respond to requests for comment.


For everything Internet-related, from the latest legal and policy-related news, to domain name updates, see ZDNet UK's Internet News Section.

Have your say instantly, and see what others have said. Go to the ZDNet news forum.

Let the editors know what you think in the Mailroom.

  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendly Print with Dell

Did you find this article useful?
45 out of 99 people found this useful


Full Talkback thread

0 comments

Company/Topic Alerts

Create a new alert from the list below:






Related Jobs

Websphere Portal Technical Consultant - Berkshire

Huxley Associates are working with a Leading technology provider in the Berkshire area to recruit an experienced Websphere Portal Technical ...

JAVA J2EE Technical Architect- JAVA J2EE- IBM Portal- JSR 168

Expertise in IBM products will be highly valued: Websphere, IBM Portal (JSR168), WECM, JAVA J2EE technical architect with expertise in OOD, UML & RUP ...

Firewalls Engineer Lead

Extensive working knowledge of logical and physical Firewalls across Cisco Pix (95%), Nokia Checkpoint, and Borderware including Operating systems - ...

Discussions

David Long David Long

Defragging: Merits?

Thursday 24 July 2008, 10:30 AM

12 posts

Featured Talkback

When all is said, if Microsoft produce the best product people will buy it and thats a good thing. If people have to buy their product because no one else can produce an alternative, only because interoperability protocols are kept secret, then thats a bad thing.

By: pround

Read full story:
EU court crushes Microsoft's antitrust appeal