ZDNet UK


Skip to Main Content

ZDNet.co.uk - Winner of Best Business Website 2007
  1. Home
  2. News
  3. Blogs
  4. Reviews
  5. Prices
  6. Resources
  7. Community
  8. My ZDNet

 

ZDNet UK RSS Feeds


IT Jobs

Industry watch Toolkit

Nvidia told to keep supplying Xbox chips

Matthew Broersma ZDNet.co.uk

Published: 12 Sep 2002 13:44 BST

  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendly
  • Post Comment

Graphics chip maker Nvidia has been ordered to continue supplying Microsoft with Xbox chips, the company has revealed.

In a regulatory filing on Tuesday, Nvidia said that an interim ruling by a third-party arbitrator required Nvidia to supply Microsoft's "reasonable requirements" for Xbox chipsets while the case is pending. Nvidia and Microsoft entered into a binding arbitration process in April over how many Xbox chips Nvidia is required to produce, and what price Microsoft should pay.

The arrangement to supply graphics hardware for the Xbox, Microsoft's gaming console, has been in place since the spring of 2000 when Microsoft paid Nvidia an advance of $200m (about £128m) against future orders. The deal has not, however, proved lucrative for Nvidia so far. In July, Nvidia warned that it has been forced to write off a large amount of inventory, including Xbox chips that became obsolete when Microsoft changed security codes for the console to thwart hackers.

Microsoft is currently paying Nvidia in advance for chips it orders, but is asking arbitrators to reduce the chips' prices and to award damages. (Nvidia is also asking for price relief and for damages.) As a result, Nvidia has been forced to set aside part of the income from the Xbox chips, amounting to the difference between what Microsoft is paying and what it says it should be paying. This was about $46.2m as of 28 July, according to Nvidia. The arbitration is not expected to conclude until next June.

If it loses the arbitration, Nvidia has warned in regulatory filings that it could be forced to produce Xbox chips at a loss, and to reduce production of other products to fulfil Xbox demand. The company could also be compelled to licence its intellectual property as part of the settlement, Nvidia said.

"Even if the Company does prevail, there can be no assurance that its business will not be materially harmed," Nvidia stated in the filing.

Microsoft has a motive to reduce component prices, since it is estimated to be losing as much as $150 for each Xbox sold. The company recently introduced a new video processor into the console as a way of reducing prices. Flextronics International, which manufactures the Xbox, is in the process of transferring some Xbox production from Hungary to China as a means of further reducing costs.


See Chips Central for the latest headlines on processors and semiconductors.

To find out more about the computers and hardware that these chips are being used in, see ZDNet UK's Hardware News Section.

Have your say instantly, and see what others have said. Go to the Chips Central Forum.

Let the Chips Central editor know what you think by email. And sign up for the weekly Chips Central newsletter.

  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendly Print with Kyocera

Did you find this article useful?
64 out of 115 people found this useful


Full Talkback thread

0 comments

Company/Topic Alerts

Create a new alert from the list below:










Related Jobs

ITIL Change Manager UK: Corporate IT - Corby, N. Hants

Other responsibilities include: ensuring that customer satisfaction meets agreed service levels by working with customers to review performance and ...

Power Supply Design Engineer Needed ASAP/ SMPS/ London

We are looking for a senior power supply engineer for design of switch mode power electronics for A range of bluer chip clients primarily in the ...

Supply Chain & Logistics Manager - Birmingham - Circa 36,000

Reporting into the Managing Director onsite, the overall function of the role is to manage and develop the Supply Chain and ensure just in time ...

Featured Talkback

When all is said, if Microsoft produce the best product people will buy it and thats a good thing. If people have to buy their product because no one else can produce an alternative, only because interoperability protocols are kept secret, then thats a bad thing.

By: pround

Read full story:
EU court crushes Microsoft's antitrust appeal