Advertisement
Promo

Industry watch Toolkit

Verizon saves money with Linux

Stephen Shankland, CNET News.com CNET News

Published: 15 Aug 2002 14:44 BST

  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendly
  • Post Comment

Telecommunications company Verizon Communications saved $6m (£3.6m) in equipment costs by moving its programmers to Linux computers, the company said Wednesday.

The company cut costs by replacing programmers' Unix and Windows workstations with Linux systems that run OpenOffice instead of Microsoft Office, said George Hughes, a Verizon executive overseeing the work. The average desktop cost went from $22,000 (£13,000) to $3,000 (£1,800) per developer, he said in a talk at the LinuxWorld Conference and Expo.

Cost cutting is one of the key arguments behind adoption of Linux. Linux is available for free or at low cost from companies such as MandrakeSoft.

As ZDNet reported yesterday, Air New Zealand is another company that went with Linux to save costs. The company is replacing 150 existing Compaq Computer Windows servers and a 150 more that would been purchased in the next 12 to 15 months with an IBM z800 mainframe running Linux. The overall cost of ownership of the mainframe is more than 30 percent less, chief information officer for Air New Zealand Andrew Care said.

The company is running lower-end jobs, including the Bynari e-mail server software and the Samba file-sharing software, Care said, but plans to move more critical jobs such as flight-booking software to Linux systems later.

Microsoft, unsurprisingly, sees price tags in a different light: mainframes are expensive and Microsoft's Office software is easier to use than alternatives, according to Peter Houston, senior director of Microsoft's Windows server product management group.

Houston is skeptical that it's more expensive to use low-end Windows-Intel servers than running those tasks on high-end mainframes. "We're talking about some of the most expensive (computing power) in the industry," he said.

One useful feature available on mainframes is the ability to easily set up and tear down a test Linux server without having to buy new hardware, said Care. With the mainframe's ability to run numerous separate operating systems simultaneously, programmers can easily try out new projects. Air New Zealand plans to use 150 Linux servers per mainframe, but the company tested the ability to run 10,000 copies of Linux simultaneously doing real work, Care said.

On desktop computers, Houston said that StarOffice or its open-source sibling OpenOffice are "good enough" for basic tasks but are harder to use than Microsoft Office. Microsoft's studies of the 11 most frequently used operations in Microsoft Office took on average 2.5 less time than in StarOffice, he said.

Microsoft's arch enemy Sun Microsystems -- the company that released the 5 million lines of StarOffice code as open-source software -- plans to sell Linux for some corporate desktop computers, while companies such as Lindows and CodeWeavers are working to make it possible to run Windows software on Linux machines. Generally, however, the technical nature of Linux has helped to keep it out of mainstream use.

Verizon cost savings came not only from replacing Windows systems but also from buying Linux computers that were cheaper than Unix workstations, Hughes said.

The Verizon programmers are creating software that runs on the company's Unix servers from Sun and HP. Linux, a clone of Unix, is similar enough that programmers don't need the more expensive Unix workstations he added.

Red Hat, the dominant seller of Linux software and services, competes with Microsoft but is aiming much of its sales efforts at replacing Unix systems.

There are problems, though, Hughes admits. Sometimes there are differences between Linux and Unix that are a concern. In addition, the Intel workstations from HP that the programmers use have 32-bit processors, whereas the Unix servers where the software ultimately runs are 64-bit machines, meaning there could be compatibility problems.


Is Linux really a viable alternative to Windows on the desktop? Read the latest headlines at ZDNet UK's Operating Systems News Section.

Have your say instantly, and see what others have said. Go to the ZDNet news forum.

Let the editors know what you think in the Mailroom.

  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendlyPrint with EPSON

Did you find this article useful?
60 out of 82 people found this useful


Full Talkback thread

0 comments

Company/Topic Alerts

Create a new alert from the list below:





Discussions

siarad siarad

Linux useless for home PC

Sunday 29 November 2009, 11:12 AM

1 comment
Fat Pop Do Wop Fat Pop Do Wop

How far will it all go?

Sunday 29 November 2009, 12:04 AM

3 comments
siarad siarad

Maybe, similarly,

Saturday 28 November 2009, 8:42 AM

3 comments
Video icon

Video

Featured Talkback

In association with Network Liberation Movement
When all is said, if Microsoft produce the best product people will buy it and thats a good thing. If people have to buy their product because no one else can produce an alternative, only because interoperability protocols are kept secret, then thats a bad thing.

By: pround

Read full story:
EU court crushes Microsoft's antitrust appeal


Skip Sub Navigation Links to CNET Brand Links

Help

Become part of the ZDNet community.

Newsletters