Advertisement
Promo

Industry watch Toolkit

Online music services accused of anti-competitiveness

Jim Hu CNET News

Published: 09 Jul 2002 10:41 BST

  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendly
  • Post Comment

Record industry executives and critics are trading barbs at an industry conference this week, with an outspoken legislator saying major labels' online subscription services may amount to a "duopoly."

Rep. Rick Boucher, Democrat-Virginia, warned on Monday that the recording industry's efforts to sell music on the Internet could have anti-competitive implications.

During a keynote address at the Jupiter PlugIn online music conference in New York, the congressman also roundly criticised the recording industry's moves to prevent piracy of their copyrighted works. Among the topics targeted by Boucher's address were the recording industry's attempts to protect CDs, existing federal copyright law, and future legislation that could give content providers more power to take matters into their own hands.

But the creation of the recording industry's online music services, Pressplay and MusicNet, has long been the focus of Boucher's criticism. He called on Monday for legislation that requires both services, which between them own the copyrights to 80 percent of all recorded music, to offer the same licence terms to competitors. Boucher added that offering preferential licensing terms could have anti-competition implications.

"That level of duopoly... of content ownership and the ownership of distribution is threatening to the arrival of competition in the delivery of music on the Web," he said.

Record industry executives, however, said Boucher's complaints merely reflected his desire for more regulation.

"I think he (makes such statements) to try to give more weight to his desire to regulate the music industry," said Hilary Rosen, chief executive of the Recording Industry Association of America. Boucher has "taken a piecemeal approach to individual complaints and tried to put it in the context of a whole strategy. But it's not a strategy."

The two industry-backed services were created last year in attempts to convince consumers they should be paying for music they access through the Web. Pressplay is a joint venture between Sony Music Entertainment and Vivendi Universal's Universal Music Group, while MusicNet has the backing of EMI Recorded Music, Bertelsmann's BMG Entertainment, AOL Time Warner's Warner Music Group and streaming media company RealNetworks.

Pressplay and MusicNet were reactions to file-swapping services such as Napster, Gnutella and Kazaa, which have lured millions of people by allowing them to share music files for free. The recording industry has successfully sued and crippled Napster, requiring it to create a service that respects copyrights.

Since launching, consumers using Pressplay and MusicNet have criticised the services as inadequate, citing catalogue limitations and clunky technology. Meanwhile, online music start-ups have alleged that the recording industry offered them unfavorable licensing terms to hinder their businesses. Such complaints prompted the Justice Department to begin investigating the services.

Boucher also took a shot against the recording industry's attempts to introduce copy-protection technology in new CDs, predicting the industry would "pay a heavy price" among angry consumers. He noted that such technology routinely has been thwarted by homemade measures and that continued practice would only push people toward free file-sharing services.

"I'm quizzical about why this approach is going forward," Boucher said.

RIAA's Rosen, however, argued that technological controls could gain consumer support.

"I am optimistic that if handled right and explained fully, consumers will support formats that give them flexibility and also help us stop piracy," she said.


See the MP3 News Section for the latest on everything from MP3 players to Napster and the other music swapping services.

Have your say instantly, and see what others have said. Go to the Napster Debate.

Let the editors know what you think in the Mailroom.

  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendlyPrint with EPSON

Did you find this article useful?
77 out of 119 people found this useful


Full Talkback thread

0 comments

Company/Topic Alerts

Create a new alert from the list below:






Discussions

GeoffO GeoffO

DNA details of innocent will be kept f...

Thursday 12 November 2009, 12:05 PM

3 comments
ator1940 ator1940

Open source code

Thursday 12 November 2009, 3:57 AM

3 comments
CA CA

DNA details of innocent will be kept f...

Wednesday 11 November 2009, 10:46 PM

3 comments
Video icon

Video

Featured Talkback

In association with Network Liberation Movement
When all is said, if Microsoft produce the best product people will buy it and thats a good thing. If people have to buy their product because no one else can produce an alternative, only because interoperability protocols are kept secret, then thats a bad thing.

By: pround

Read full story:
EU court crushes Microsoft's antitrust appeal


Skip Sub Navigation Links to CNET Brand Links

Help

Become part of the ZDNet community.

Newsletters