ZDNet UK


Skip to Main Content

ZDNet.co.uk - Winner of Best Business Website 2007
  1. Home
  2. News
  3. Blogs
  4. Reviews
  5. Prices
  6. Resources
  7. Community
  8. My ZDNet

 

ZDNet UK RSS Feeds


IT Jobs

Industry watch Toolkit

Red Hat defends controversial patent applications

Matthew Broersma ZDNet.co.uk

Published: 31 May 2002 16:57 BST

  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendly
  • Post Comment

Linux distributor Red Hat has published a clarification of its policy on software patents, defending itself against criticism of the company's patents policy.

Red Hat, which has the biggest market share of any Linux distributor, came under fire last week when it emerged that the software company had applied for two software patents. In its policy, Red Hat condemns software patents but argues that it must build up a patent portfolio of its own as a defensive measure.

Open-source developers and companies such as Red Hat generally argue that software patents hinder innovation, since it is next to impossible to create software that does not use patented ideas. Large companies with an arsenal of patents, the argument goes, can put rivals out of business by suing them, since even a poor case would be too expensive for many companies to defend themselves against.

The tactic adopted by Red Hat and other companies is to maintain a defensive patent arsenal, in case they need to launch a counter-suit. In such a case the two companies can resolve the dispute by cross-licensing the patents to one another, avoiding protracted legal battles on both sides.

"In the interests of our company and in an attempt to protect and promote the open-source community, Red Hat has elected to adopt this same stance," the company's policy states. "We do so reluctantly because of the perceived inconsistency with our stance against software patents; however, prudence dictates this position."

The company said it saw no reason why its stance should affect its position as an advocate of open source. "We believe the position we are taking is consistent with both the interests of the open-source/free software community and our company," said Mark Webbink, senior vice president and general counsel, in a statement.

As part of the policy, Red Hat said it will not attempt to enforce its patents when they are used in open-source software. Open-source software is distributed under a licence that allows users to modify and redistribute it, as long as the modified versions are themselves open source.

However, Red Hat omitted software covered by the BSD licence from its agreement, since software covered by a BSD licence can be integrated into proprietary software.

The two patent applications in question were filed last August, listing Ingo Molnar as the inventor. One is for a Embedded Protocol Objects and the other is method and apparatus for atomic file lookup. The patent filings were originally reported on an Italian site called FreeGo.


For all your GNU/Linux and open source news, from the latest kernel releases to the newest distributions, see ZDNet UK's Linux Lounge.

Have your say instantly, and see what others have said. Go to the Linux forum.

Let the editors know what you think in the Mailroom.

  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendly Print with Kyocera

Did you find this article useful?
46 out of 98 people found this useful


Full Talkback thread

0 comments


Company/Topic Alerts

Create a new alert from the list below:







Related Jobs

Linux Systems Administrator/ NOC Engineer looking for a challenge ??

Linux/Unix/ Red- Hat/ Are you a Linux Systems Administrator/ NOC Engineer looking for a new challenge ? Do you want to work for the world leading ...

Senior Network Engineer - Windows - Redhat - Cisco Warrington 30k

Skills required include: - Desirable skills include experience of Red Hat Linux, Windows Server 2003 and exposure to ISO and ITIL - Knowledge of ...

C++ , UNIX Software Engineer

C/C++ Engineer with experience on UNIX/Linux/Linux Red Hat is needed to work for a bleeding edge organisation in Manchester. It is essential that you ...

Discussions

1000030281 1000030281

Facebook Bans Firefox 3

Sunday 20 July 2008, 2:33 AM

1 comment
roger andre roger andre

SP3 Under Suspicion Again

Saturday 19 July 2008, 9:29 PM

2 comments

Featured Talkback

When all is said, if Microsoft produce the best product people will buy it and thats a good thing. If people have to buy their product because no one else can produce an alternative, only because interoperability protocols are kept secret, then thats a bad thing.

By: pround

Read full story:
EU court crushes Microsoft's antitrust appeal