ZDNet UK


Skip to Main Content

ZDNet.co.uk - Winner of Best Business Website 2007
  1. Home
  2. News
  3. Blogs
  4. Reviews
  5. Prices
  6. Resources
  7. Community
  8. My ZDNet

 

ZDNet UK RSS Feeds


IT Jobs

Industry watch Toolkit

Klez worm refuses to die

Published: 20 May 2002 09:19 BST

  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendly
  • Post Comment

It may only be a matter of time before you're accused of spreading the Klez virus. A month after it started spreading, the Klez.h worm isn't slowing down, said antivirus experts on Friday. Moreover, the worm's technique of forging the address of the sender on each infected e-mail message is creating a flood of warnings from gateway antivirus software informing the wrong people that they are infected.

"A lot of traffic is being multiplied by the response mechanisms and refusal mechanisms," said Fred Cohen, security practitioner in residence at the University of New Haven in the US.

In many cases, antivirus software protecting a company's e-mail gateways is sending out a response to each infected e-mail inadvertently sent out by a victim -- but that warning is going to the wrong person. "So, in effect, you're getting twice the fun you would normally get," Cohen said.

Apart from magnifying the amount of spam produced by the virus, the incorrect identification of those who are infected is also responsible for hindering efforts to fight the spread of the worm, said Cohen.

Faked addresses
The Klez.h variant, which appeared in mid-April, infects PCs whose users open the attachment to an infected e-mail. Confusing matters, the e-mail will have a random "from" address, selected from various sources on the original victim's hard drive. And it pairs this bogus sender's address with one of more than 120 different subject lines.

When a user opens the attachment, the virus starts up its own e-mail engine and mass mails itself to e-mail addresses found in various files on the PC, using a source address culled from those addresses. Klez.h can also send out a random file from the PC as an attachment, along with the e-mail that carries the worm, potentiall passing confidential information.

In some instances, the worm also drops one of several other viruses, including the destructive CIH, and tries to remove any active antivirus software from the system.

Overall, the Klez.h variant has been extremely successful.

"The spread has been really steady," said John Harrington, director of US marketing for e-mail service provider MessageLabs. "We've seen 20,000 again today (Friday), and there's no indication that this is dying down."

While the worm has not spread as quickly as, say, the LoveLetter virus--of which MessageLabs received one copy for every 23 legitimate e-mails during the virus' peak in May 2000 -- it does make up one out of nearly every 170 e-mails, Harrington said.

In fact, the steady spread -- rather than a firestorm of e-mails--may actually be part of the reason for the worm's success, said Harrington. The Klez.h variant did manage to top the charts of computer viruses in April.

"It kind of cruises below the radar screen," Harrington said. "Everyone had heard of LoveLetter. But if you go into a computer shop and ask people if they've heard of Klez, they'll shake their heads."

Hard to track
The Klez variant's ability to spoof the source of infected e-mail makes it nearly impossible to track down the infected users who sent the virus.

"The whole spoofing thing adds a dimension to it that is a little different," said Vincent Gullotto, vice president of Network Associates' antivirus emergency response team. "It's definitely possible that the false addresses are slowing response."

Network Associates still receives more than 50 reports a day of the worm from customers, and some corporate clients are seeing more than 20,000 messages carrying the virus at their e-mail gateways.

The response to Klez -- that uninfected users are being told they sent a virus -- shows the holes in the system, added Gullotto.

In addition, some out-of-the-office auto-reply mechanisms may be going haywire as a result of an infected user sending an e-mail with a random source and receiver who are both away.

"I am sure there are some auto-reply wars that have been going on," Gullotto said. "There has been a lot of mail that is going around that is caused by this."

Until system administrators disable antivirus notification on the e-mail gateway servers, the confusion will only continue.


For all security-related news, including updates on the latest viruses, hacking exploits and patches, check out ZDNet UK's Viruses and Hacking News Section.

Have your say instantly, and see what others have said. Go to the Security forum.

Let the editors know what you think in the Mailroom.

  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendly Print with Dell

Did you find this article useful?
31 out of 73 people found this useful


Full Talkback thread

0 comments


Company/Topic Alerts

Create a new alert from the list below:






Related Jobs

Test Manager Thames Valley

Huxley Associates client requires a Test Manager from an energy (trading) background, to take ownership of the test approach for a system ...

SOX Tester Thames Valley

Huxley Associates client requires a business-minded SOX Tester with strong audit/compliance experience of assessing/testing ITGC across the entire ...

Test Lead Thames Valley

Huxley Associates client requires a Test Lead for a hands-on role undertaking creation of test scripts and execution, who has worked the full SDLC, ...

Discussions

David Long David Long

Defragging: Merits?

Thursday 24 July 2008, 10:30 AM

12 posts

Featured Talkback

When all is said, if Microsoft produce the best product people will buy it and thats a good thing. If people have to buy their product because no one else can produce an alternative, only because interoperability protocols are kept secret, then thats a bad thing.

By: pround

Read full story:
EU court crushes Microsoft's antitrust appeal