Advertisement
Promo

Industry watch Toolkit

Slashdot joins the ad-free melee

Stefanie Olsen, CNET News.com CNet

Published: 04 Mar 2002 09:59 GMT

  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendly
  • Post Comment

"News for Nerds" Web site Slashdot.org has joined the dark side, lining up with leagues of other Net publishers to start selling larger, more imposing advertisements and placing a premium on commercial-free pages.

Slashdot, whose discussion boards are a favourite among techies, will start displaying bigger ads on its Web pages Monday, after announcing it would do so in late October. To placate visitors opposed to ads altogether, the site will also sell a subscription to promotion-free pages.

"The large ads that you see on many other sites are coming here," read a note posted on the site from Slashdot co-founder Rob "CmdrTaco" Malda last week. "We really don't have an option; these are what advertisers want, and if we don't provide them, we won't be around much longer. But we want to give you an option to see Slashdot without these ads."

The changes at Slashdot are part of a ripple effect in Web publishing that began with the dot-com bust, when previously free-flowing ad dollars ran dry. Since early 2001, bigger, more intrusive ads spread like wildfire across mainstream Web sites in publishers' attempts to grab reader attention and encourage sceptical marketers to spend online. Subscriptions have also become more common at previously free Web venues.

Last February, CNET Networks, publisher of News.com and ZDNet UK, was the first to introduce a larger interactive ad, called a messenger plus unit, set directly in the middle of a Web page. Sites such as NYTimes.com and Yahoo! quickly adopted the ad unit, among other fast-growing experiments in Web advertising, including pop-under ads, skyscrapers and "leader board" ads -- large banners that run atop the page.

So far, larger ads are improving response and brand recall from Web visitors, researchers say.

On Monday, Slashdot will introduce the messaging units and larger banners. One of its first advertisers will be IBM, according to Jeff "Hemos" Bates, Slashdot's director and executive editor.

The site will also offer subscribers an inventive way to avoid ads. Unlike many other Web publishers that employ a monthly or annual subscription rate, Slashdot will charge $5 (about £3) for every 1,000 ad-free pages. For about 80 percent of its roughly 330,000 daily visitors, this amounts to little less than $20 a year, the cost of a typical magazine subscription. But for avid visitors, about 15 percent of its audience, the rate will go up to about $5 a month.

"The problem with other subscription systems is that they're essentially one-size-fits-all systems," Bates said. "We wanted to create a system that catered more to our individual people."

Already, Slashdot visitors have posted more than 1,400 messages on the topic, with arguments weighted strongly against a sliding scale.

"I'm a big fan of Slashdot and read it all the time," wrote one visitor. "Given my reading habits (and that I post fairly frequently) I'm positive I fall in at least the top 15 percent ($5 a month)... I'd love to support Slashdot, but not on these terms."

Others saw the silver lining in the move.

"It was completely predictable that a lot of people would complain about this," wrote another reader. "I suspect it's largely the same group who complain about everything. When all is said and done, the majority of them will continue to read Slashdot.

"I, for one, was happy to have the chance to help support Slashdot, and I bought a lot of page views," the reader continued. "People have compared the subscription rates to those of newspapers, but Slashdot is worth much more to me than any newspaper."


For all your GNU/Linux and open source news, from the latest kernel releases to the newest distributions, see ZDNet UK's Linux Lounge.

Have your say instantly, and see what others have said. Go to the Linux forum.

Let the editors know what you think in the Mailroom.

  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendlyPrint with EPSON

Did you find this article useful?
38 out of 67 people found this useful


Full Talkback thread

0 comments

Company/Topic Alerts

Create a new alert from the list below:








Discussions

hkommedal hkommedal

The bill's Clause 17. .

Friday 4 December 2009, 4:30 AM

3 comments
CA CA

HP workers set dates for strikes

Friday 4 December 2009, 4:17 AM

1 comment
splendidcrm splendidcrm

SplendidCRM also on Azure

Friday 4 December 2009, 4:08 AM

1 comment
CA CA

Or...

Friday 4 December 2009, 4:02 AM

3 comments
Video icon

Video

Featured Talkback

In association with Network Liberation Movement
When all is said, if Microsoft produce the best product people will buy it and thats a good thing. If people have to buy their product because no one else can produce an alternative, only because interoperability protocols are kept secret, then thats a bad thing.

By: pround

Read full story:
EU court crushes Microsoft's antitrust appeal


Skip Sub Navigation Links to CNET Brand Links

Help

Become part of the ZDNet community.

Newsletters