ZDNet UK


Skip to Main Content

ZDNet.co.uk - Winner of Best Business Website 2007
  1. Home
  2. News
  3. Blogs
  4. Reviews
  5. Prices
  6. Resources
  7. Community
  8. My ZDNet

 

ZDNet UK RSS Feeds


IT Jobs

Industry watch Toolkit

Packard joins HP-Compaq family feud

Tiffany Kary CNet

Published: 07 Nov 2001 16:03 GMT

  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendly
  • Post Comment

Opposition to Hewlett-Packard's bid to buy Compaq Computer has gained ground as David Packard, son of the HP co-founder, said that he would back the Hewlett family's decision to oppose the acquisition.

The moves deliver a significant blow to the planned $21.55bn acquisition, announced in early September. Analysts say the deal now has a 50-50 chance of falling through.

On Tuesday, the Hewlett family, which owns 8 percent of HP, announced its opposition to the merger. Packard said in a statement, also issued on Tuesday, that he personally agrees with the Hewlett family's decision.

"The merger comes down to one question -- which way does the David and Lucille Packard Foundation vote?" said Lehman Brothers analyst Dan Niles.

As family opposition to the deal gains momentum, HP's board of directors -- with the exception of Walter Hewlett -- reaffirmed on Wednesday that it stands firmly behind the deal to acquire Compaq.

"The board thoroughly analysed this transaction and unanimously concluded this is the very best way to deliver the value our shareowners expect," Dick Hackborn, former chairman of HP, said in a statement. "Today, I'm even more convinced of the power of this combination, particularly given the progress of our integration plans."

David Packard is not part of the Packard Foundation, which owns 10.3 percent of HP's shares and could vote either way. He did say that the foundation is extremely unlikely to support the merger, however.

"For some time I have been skeptical about management's confidence that it can aggressively reinvent HP culture overnight," Packard said in the statement, which Niles obtained and made available in a report.

He also criticised the logic of the merger plan for depending on massive employee layoffs of at least 15,000 -- probably more -- which, he said, went against HP's corporate tradition. "For over fifty years, one of HP's fundamental corporate objectives has been to provide long-term employment for its people," he said.

Although analysts say the deal is likely to unravel, they have also suggested it could proceed with a different structure. "It is also possible for HP to change the structure of the deal, e.g., to include some kind of spinoff of the PC biz before the shareholder vote," Niles said.

The possibility of the deal's collapse drove HP shares down 17 cents to $19.64 in premarket trading. Compaq shares sunk 43 cents, or 5 percent, to $8.07.

See techTrader for the latest financial news in the high-tech sector.

Have your say instantly, and see what others have said. Click on the TalkBack button and go to the techTrader forum

Let the editors know what you think in the Mailroom. And read other letters.

  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendly Print with Kyocera

Did you find this article useful?
43 out of 71 people found this useful


Full Talkback thread

0 comments


Company/Topic Alerts

Create a new alert from the list below:






Related Jobs

UK Sales Manager - AIDC/Bar-coding - Home based - to 40K / 65K OTE

Structure to be confirmed but usually split between sales, IFO and performance against SMART goals - If UK based: private healthcare, 1 x salary ...

Project Manager within Reference Data for a Top Tier Investment Bank

The Bank has grown through merger and acquisition and as such several duplicate systems across client/counterparty, static, pricing and Reference ...

Managing Consultant - Financial Services

EDS value proposition, and determining solution or offering that best fits clients needs - Work within geographically dispersed teams, securing ...

Featured Talkback

When all is said, if Microsoft produce the best product people will buy it and thats a good thing. If people have to buy their product because no one else can produce an alternative, only because interoperability protocols are kept secret, then thats a bad thing.

By: pround

Read full story:
EU court crushes Microsoft's antitrust appeal